Skip to main content

Floral diversity and conservation status of vascular plants in arid mountainous areas

Abstract

Background

The destructive human activities, encroachment of natural habitats, and hyperarid climate threaten the wild flora of the unprotected mountainous areas facing the Gulf of Suez, Egypt. So, this study aims to revise and give an updated systematic status of the flowering plants growing there to conserve and utilize valuable biodiversity.

Results

This study showed the presence of 136 species, including 7 sub-species of vascular plants, 12 species of monocots, and 124 species dicots belonged to 98 genera and 37 families. The most species-rich families were Asteraceae (22 species) and Amaranthaceae (19 species). Therophytes and Chamaephytes were the most dominant life- forms in the study area, representing 38.2%. They were followed by Phanerophytes, Hemicryptophytes, and Cryptophytes, which represented 11%, 8.8%, and 2.9%, respectively. Five plant assemblages were identified by TWINSAPN classification namely, Zygophyllum coccineumHaloxylon salicornicum assemblage, Zilla spinosa -Zygophyllum coccineum assemblage, Zygophyllum coccineum-Tamarix nilotica assemblage, Tamarix nilotica – Phargmites australis assemblage and Tamarix nilotica–Chenopodium murale assemblage. Several invasive species were recorded in some wadis. However, their presence is unusual to the floristic composition of the wadis in general and acts as an alarm to protect the native species from anthropogenic interference. Moisture content, organic matter, electrical conductivity, pH, cations, anions, and total carbonate were identified as the significant factors controlling distribution of plant clusters by detrended correspondence analysis. This study recorded Tribulus mollis as a new addition to Egypt’s flora of Eastern desert.

Conclusion

The comparative analysis of the present and past floral studies in the study area reveals a significant change in the plant community composition. This shift is likely attributed to the adverse impacts of climate change and anthropogenic activities. Thus, this area has to be safeguarded with practical strategies that aid in preserving the significant uncommon flora.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The wild flora of the mountainous area in Egypt facing the Gulf of Suez is under severe threat due to various factors, including quarries, the construction of the Al-Galala-Wadi Hagul-Zafarana new road, cement factories, tourism development, and climate change. These factors have a destructive effect on the natural flora, altering the distribution of plants and leading to the extinction of some species in the study area [1,2,3,4].

Quarries and the construction of the new road have had a significant negative impact on flora and biodiversity. The use of heavy machinery and explosives has led to air pollution, dislocation and interruption of water to fertile soil, habitat destruction, and damage to flora [1]. Cement factories also contribute to the problem by producing dust and gases that contaminate the soil and negatively impact plant physiological processes, reducing plant length, leaves, and cover, and sometimes even resulting in extinction [2].

The development of the tourism industry along the Red Sea coastlines has also endangered large areas of the desert and numerous plant populations. Over 15% of the Red Sea’s coastline zone has been taken over by hotels and tourist settlements in the past ten years [3]. Some of these tourist villages and summer resorts were also established along Suez and Ain-Shokna highways till Zafarana, negatively affecting the growth and frequency of wild plants.

Climate change, characterized by high temperatures and a lack of rainfall in the study area, is another significant factor determining the presence, development, growth, distribution, and densities of plants. It restricts the availability of vital plant nutrients and crop growth and adversely affects ecological processes. Additionally, the increased soil salinization rate accompanying aridity further inhibits flora growth [4].

Despite the importance of the study region, it remains poorly investigated, and there has never been a recent comprehensive study on the flora or vegetation of the mountainous areas facing the Gulf of Suez. However, some ecological studies have been conducted on limited sites within the study area, such as Cairo-Suez Road, Ain Shokna, Wadi Hagul, and Gebel Ataqa [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].

Furthermore, much work must be done to improve the Egyptian flora, including updating the names of families and taxa, revising the geographic distribution of many species, and thoroughly exploring the flora of some region.

As part of a conservation approach, this study aims to determine the current floristic composition of the study region and demonstrate the extent to which it is impacted by human activity and climate change.

Materials and methods

Study area

The study area is the mountainous areas facing the North-East section of the Gulf of Suez. It is located at 30° 0’ 28.90” N, 32° 17’ 23.37” E, about 8,571.49 km2, extending from Cairo-Suez Road to Zafarana. It is represented by 80 collection sites including eleven wadis: Wadi Hemra, Wadi Hagul, Wadi El- Bada, Wadi Ghweiba, Wadi El-Gamil, Wadi El-Ramliya, Wadi Amlog, Wadi Malaha, Wadi Khurri, Ras Abu Darag, and Wadi Abu Dahab. In addition, it includes several mountains: Gebel Ataqa, Gebel Um Zeita, Gebel El-Ramylia, Gebel Um Rosis, Gebel El-Akheider, Gebel Masama, and Gebel Moghra Bahria (Fig. 1).

The Eastern Desert is characterized by various geomorphologic units, with structural plateaus and ridges supported by carbonate rocks. The southeastern half is primarily affected by sandstone-based structural plains, while elevated beaches and lagoonal mud cover the coastal lowlands. The basement ridge, which rises 1000 m above sea level, is the primary watershed area [14]. The desert surrounding the Red Sea is primarily mountainous, with coastal mountains on the western side. A gently sloping plain stretches between hills and coastline, with sand covering the wide coastal plain. Wadis, drainage systems, meander east, empties into the Red Sea and Gulf of Suez and drain their water [7].

The study area has a subtropical desert/low-latitude, arid, hot climate, with monthly average temperatures varying between summer and winter. The highest average temperature is 35.3 °C in summer, while the lowest is 15.3 °C in winter. Precipitation is highest in winter, with 5 mm average, while spring and summer have the lowest according to the Köppen-Geiger classification (BWh)and the Holdridge life zones system of bioclimatic classification [15].

Fig. 1
figure 1

The location of the collection sites of the study area

The Eastern Desert Mountains are drained by numerous wadis, with a catchment area of around 500 km2. The global regulated potential is a few hundred thousand m3 per year per wadi, with exploitation potential not exceeding a few hundred m3/day. The basement complex, composed of crystalline rocks, has abundant water points, but high rainfall conditions limit water retention. Wadis are primarily drained from deeper alluvial pockets or rocky shelves [14].

This study is based on fresh specimens from their natural habitats, including the 2022 to 2024 representing 80 collection sites. The belt transect method was used in sampling of the collected plant specimens within the study area. The transects were established to covered the entire length of the wadi. Along each transect, we recorded the presence or absence of all plant species encountered. All specimens are conserved and preserved in the Suez Canal University Herbarium (SCU-I). (3–7) specimens vouchered each taxon observed in the field. The studied specimens were identified by Boulos [16,17,18,19] & [20]. The specimens were also compared with herbarium sheets kept in the Suez Canal University Herbarium (SCU-I). In addition to using the plant flora of different neighboring countries were also used to achieve an accurate identification [21] & [22]. The recent valid names of the recorded taxa were revised and verified with international reference databases [23]. The geographical distribution of the recorded species in Egypt and the world [24].

Three soil samples were taken from each collection site to undergo some vegetation analysis. The soil samples were collected from a depth of 0–30 cm using a shovel. The samples were placed on sheets of paper to be air-dried for one week and mixed to make one composite soil sample. The composite soil samples were passed through a 2 mm sieve to get rid of gravels and debris. Physical analysis performed by using the pipette method [25]. Organic matter and Organic carbon percentage were determined by using Walkley and Black method [26]. Soil samples were subjected to chemical soil analysis. The saturated soil paste extract’s electrical conductivity (EC) was measured in dsm− 1 using the meter model Jenway 3310 [27]. Soil pH was measured in a 1:2.5 soil-to-water suspension using a bench-type Beckman glass electrode pH meter [28]. Calcium and magnesium were extracted from the saturated soil using volumetric titration with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and measured in mEq/L. Sodium and potassium were measured using a flame photometer. Bicarbonate was titrated with sulfuric acid and measured in mEq/L [28], while chloride was measured in mEq/L using silver nitrate. The total calcium carbonate percentage was calculated using Collin’s calcimeter [29].

The phytosociological data set, consisting of 80 sites and 136 species, was classified using the TWINSPAN (Two-way Indicator Species Analysis) technique in the PC-ORD computer program [30], version 4.01 for Windows. This multivariate analysis technique arranges multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of individuals and attributes. To interpret the species/environment relationships, ordination was carried out using DCA technique in PC-ORD computer program [30], version 4.01 for Windows Detrended Correspondence Analysis is a multivariate method used for sorting species and samples along environmental gradients.

It must be stated that the flora of the study area suffers from the harmful side effects of quarries and cement factories. Some habitats of the wild flora in the study area were destroyed completely due to the work of heavy machinery. Subsequently, all the wild plants were completely eroded. This was obvious in the area between the 46th and 47th sites, represented by 13.222 km2. (Fig. 2C and D)

Great evidence of the disastrous effects of cement manufacturers may be seen at site 27th. The plants were unable to survive, and it was very arid as the soil became extremely hard, like cement. So, it was tough to take a soil sample from this site (Fig. 2E).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Various types of anthropogenic interference that lead to habitat loss for the natural wild flora. (A&B): Summer resorts Infront of mountains. (C&D): Quarries and Building of Al-Galala–Wadi Hagul–Zafarana new road (Distance between site 46th and 47th). (E): Cement factories alter the soil’s composition, making it harder and not conducive to plant life. (Site 27th). (F): The hyper arid climate effect on plants

Results

In the study area, the species composition revealed 136 species, including 7 sub-species; these species were divided into 124 dicot and 12 monocot species, belonging to 37 families and 98 genera of vascular plants. They included three trees, 12 shrubs, 84 perennials, 2 biennials, and 50 annuals. The most species- rich families were Asteraceae (22 species), Amaranthaceae (19 species) and Brassicaceae (10 species). They represented 16.1%, 13.9%, and 7.3% of total collected samples, followed by Fabaceae, Poaceae, and Zygophyllaceae (9 species). The fewer species families represented by Boragoniaceae (4 species), Caryophyllaceae (3 species), and Capparaceae (2 species). Finally, twenty-one families were monogeneric: Asphodelaceae, Neuradaceae, Ephedraceae and Plumbaginaceae. (Table 1; Fig. 3).

The size of the families is typically small because just two families have more than ten species: Asteraceae and Amaranthaceae. The well-represented genera were Zygophyllum (7 species), Launaea (4 species), Chenopodium, Bassia, Tamarix, Heliotropium, Rumex, Hyoscyamus, and Haloxylon (3 species), Tribulus, Cleome and Artemisia (2 species). But, 18 genera were each represented by only one species e.g., Anastatica, Cucumis, Nitraria, and Salvia. The perennials represented most of the collected samples by 61.7%, among them Astragalus dactylocarpus, Retama raetam, Lavandula coronopifolia, Panicum turgidum, Haplophyllum tuberculatum, Kickxia aegyptiaca and Ochradenus baccatus. Shrubs represented 8.8% of collected samples, including Lycium shawii, Nitraria retusa and Tamarix nilotica, while the trees were represented by three taxa: Phoenix dactylifera, Vachellia tortilis subsp. raddiana, and Vachellia tortilis subsp. tortilis. On the other hand, the annuals represented 36.76% of the recorded species among them: Caylusea hexagyna, Scrophularia deserti, Plantago ovata and Monsonia nivea. In the study area, some species show high occurrence e.g. Zygophyllum coccineum was recorded in the 61 sites and represented 76.25% showing the highest occurrence among the recorded species, followed by Zilla spinosa (50 sites, 62.5%), Ochradenus baccatus (46 sites, 57.5%), Tamarix nilotica (38 sites, 47.5%) and Leptadenia pyrotechnica (16 sites, 20%) On the other hand, Neurada procumbens, Blepharis edulis, Asphodelus tenuifolius and Halopeplis perfoliata (one site, 1.25%) showing the lowest occurance.

The total number of species recorded in the eleven wadis of the study area is shown (Table 1; Fig. 4). The highest number of species were recorded in Wadi Hagul (88 species, 64.7%) followed by Wadi El-Bada (41 species, 30.1%), then Wadi El-Ramliya (33 species, 24.2%). Some species were recorded in all wadis showing great dominance e.g., Zygophyllum coccineum, Zilla spinosa, and Tamarix nilotica. But some species were restricted to only one wadi e.g., Gymnocarpos decander, Neurada procumbens, Salvia aegyptiaca, Tribulus mollis, Asphodelus tenuifolius and Plantago ovata, which were restricted to Wadi Hagul representing 14.7%. Indicating that it has the largest number of different species. While Chenopodiun murale, Lysimachia arvensis, Solanum lycopersicum are restricted to Ras Abu Darag, representing 8.8%. Moreover, Zygophyllum bruguieri, Atriplex humilis, and Caylusea hexagyna were restricted to Wadi El-Bada, representing 2.9%.

The life forms spectrum of the study area showed some variations. Therophytes and Chamaephytes were the highest life forms sharing the same percentage of 38.2%. Followed by Phenerophytes, which represented 11%, followed by hemicryptophytes, and cryptophytes, which represented 8.8% and 2.9%. At last, the parasites represented 0.7%. The distribution of the different life forms in the two sections of the study area was shown (Table 1; Fig. 5).

Table 1 List of recorded species in the study area, life forms, habitats and geographical distribution of the recorded species
Fig. 3
figure 3

Most species-rich families with the number of species

Fig. 4
figure 4

The number of the different life forms in the study area

Fig. 5
figure 5

The species distribution among eleven wadis

TWINSPAN has categorized the collection sites in the current study into five main assemblages: Zygophyllum coccineum – Halophyllum salicornicum assemblage, Zilla spinosa – Zygophyllum coccineum assemblage, Zygophyllum coccineum – Tamarix nilotica assemblage, Tamarix nilotica – Phargmites australis assemblage and Tamarix nilotica – Chenopodium murale assemblage. The presence percentages of species composition for these assemblages are given (Table 2). It is clear that assemblage I has no species with 100% presence, but the highest ones are 72.8% (Zygophyllum coccineum and Haloxylon salicornicum), and average abundance represents 3.5 and 2.88. So, they are the dominant species in this assemblage, followed by two codominant species, Ochradenus baccatus and Farsetia aegyptia, whose presence and average abundance represent 63.7%, 3.00 and 2.14. While Anabasis setifera and Zilla spinosa represent the associated species whose presence and average abundance represent 54.6%, 3.00, and 2.5. In the second assemblage, the dominant species with the highest presence 83.5%, 80.16% are Zilla spinosa and Zygophyllum coccineum and average abundance represent 3.16, 3.24. The codominant species is Ochradenus baccatus, whose presence and average abundance are 73.48% and 1.87. Moreover, Launaea spinosa, Iphiona mucronata, and Echinops spinosus represent the associated species, with 43.42%, 53.44%, and 40.8%, respectively, with an average abundance of 2.84, 2.62, and 2.5. In the third assemblage, the species with the highest presence are 74.2% Zygophyllum coccineum and Tamarix nilotica, and their average abundances represent 3.00 and 2.55. Followed by two codominant species, which are Zilla spinosa and Ochradenus baccatus, with a presence 59.36%, 51.94%, and an average abundance of 2.56, 3.00. While the associated species is represented by Haloxylon salicornicum whose presence and average abundance represent 37.1%, 2.2. The fourth assemblage has two species with 88% presence Tamarix nilotica and Phargmites australis, with average abundance 3.75, 3.12. Moreover, Zygophyllum coccineum represents the codominant species which represent 55.6%, 3.4 and the associated species is Nitraria retusa with a presence 33.36% and an average abundance 2.00. While the last assemblage includes six species with 100% presence e.g., Bassia indica, Tamarix nilotica, Tamarix tetragyna, Chenopodium murale, Portulaca oleracea, and Sonchus oleraceus with average abundance 3.00, 4.00, 1.00, 2.00, 2.00 respectively.

Table 2 Phytosociological table showing presence percentage and average abundance for main assemblages resulted from TWINSPAN classification. Avg = average abundance, P = Presence

This study included sixteen physical and chemical environmental factors. These factors can be classified into two main groups. The first group is a physical characteristic of the soil and soil texture by pipette method, soil moisture content, organic carbon, and organic matter content. The second group, which is the chemical characteristics of soil, includes acidity (pH), electric conductivity (EC), cations, anions, and total carbonate, which is given as a percentage of weight. The ranges and means of the environmental variables of sites supporting each assemblage reveal a general idea about the magnitude of variation in the environmental factors in the study area. There are some differences between the five assemblages’ physical attributes. The largest percentages of clay (28.2%), organic matter (1.18%), organic carbon (0.68%), and soil moisture content (12.1%) are found in the fourth assemblage. Silt percentages are highest in assemblage one at 60.5%, whereas the largest values of sand are found in the second assemblage, which shows 92.5% of the total. (Table 3)

Table 3 Minimum, maximum, mean, and standard deviation of environmental variables for the main assemblages resulted from TWINSPAN

While in the case of the chemical properties, it’s obvious that the maximum values of EC, Na+, Mg2+, K+, Ca2+, Cl−, HCO3 and SO42− contributed to the fourth assemblage representing 181 dsm− 1., 1496 mEq/L, 180 mEq/L, 470 mEq/L, 3 mEq/L, 1410 mEq/L, 81 mEq/L and 182.43 mEq/L. On the other hand, the maximum value of pH and CaCO3 are represented by 9.24, 32.3% in the second assemblage.

The DCA ordination showed that the 136 plants could be classified into four sections (Fig. 6). The first section (I) of plants was positively affected by the performed edaphic factors, including the following plants: Nitraria retusa, Trichodesma africanum, Zygophllum simplex, Zygophyllum coccineum, cleome droserifolia and melilotus indicus. Pergularia tomentosa, Cleome amplycarpa, Panicum turgidum, Zygophyllum molle and Caylusea hexagyna represented the fourth section (IV) negatively affected by edaphic factors. Then, the second section (II) included Zilla spinosa, Launaea nudicaulis and Iphiona mucronata affected by the physical and chemical factors but less than the first and the fourth section. Moreover, the third section (III) represented by Zygophyllum album, Aizoon canariense, Bassia indica and Portulaca oleracea was the same as the second one in its relation with edaphic factors. Nevertheless, because Blepharis edulis lied on the axis, the applied edaphic factors had no influence.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Ordination diagram (DCA) with plant species as points and selected environmental variables (physical and chemical)

Discussion

Although, 136 species were found in the current investigation. The species number in the study could be more than the given number. However, extremely dry weather has a diverse impact on the development and growth of several species. In addition, the quarries, cement industries, and summer resorts devastate the natural habitats of the wild plants.

By comparing the most abundant plants of this study with those of Danin [5], Mashaly [6], and Zahran and Willis [7], it becomes clear that several species have undergone significant changes in their presence. Ephedra alata, Blepharis edulis, Hyparrhenia hirta, Phagnalon barbeyanum, Reaumuria hirtella, Anastatica hierochuntica, Verbena officinalis, and Achillea santolina, which were dominant plants in the study area, have experienced a dramatic decline in population. These species are now facing local extinction or severe scarcity which may due to the combined effects of human activities and natural climatic change.

Furthermore, because of extensive overgrazing, overcollection, overcutting, and uprooting by locals and herbalists for research, fuel, medicinal uses, and local trade, other plants like Artemisia Judaica, Artemisia monosperma, Cleome droserifolia, Haplophyllum tuberculatum, and Cotula cinerea become extremely rare [7].

Abdelaal [10] and Bedair et al. [13] stated that Hyoscyamus muticus is a threatened and rare plant in Wadi Hagul. However, in this study, it wasn’t rare, and its cover could reach 70% and 50% in some sites of the Wadi (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Showing the high cover of Hyoscyamus muticus in some sites of Wadi Hagul

No study has comprehensively covered the entire region, but several studies have focused on limited sites within the study area, such as Wadi Hagul. This study revealed that Wadi Hagul included 88 species, which was higher than that given by Bedair et al. [13] (80 species), Khdery et al. [11] (27 species), Mashaly et al. [31] (57 species), and Mohamed [8] (82 species). Bedair et al. [13] shared with this study 75 species, while many others shared 27 species, 53 species, and 61 species. In contrast to Abdelaal [10] recorded 98 species sharing 73 species out of 88 species.

In the study region, the three families with the highest number of species were Asteraceae (16.1%), Amaranthaceae (13.9%), and Brassicaceae (7.3%). The order of these families does not match any of the previously mentioned Wadi Hagul studies. However, all of them confirmed that Asteraceae is the largest family in species numbers given in this study.

Because of the high levels of aridity and salinity in this area, the main families are Asteraceae and Amaranthaceae, which are remarkable for having xerophytic species and for their high ability of salt tolerance [32]. Moreover, Judd and Ferguson [33] confirmed that Amaranthaceae predilated semi-arid climates and saline habitats.

The recorded species in the study area were represented by 61.7% perennials and 37.76% annuals. This dominance of perennials was confirmed by Bedair et al. [13], Khdery et al. [11], Mashaly et al. [31] and Mohamed [8]. The possible explanation for the predominance of perennials is the little rainfall there.

The life forms spectrum of Gebel Ataqa region is dominated by therophytes and chamaephytes (38.2%) followed by phanerophytes (11%) hemicryptophytes (8.8%), cryptophytes (2.9%), the latter agreed with Khdery et al. [11].

Therophytes and chamaephytes dominance is a sign of human influence, hot, dry climate with little rainfall, and the lack of readily available microhabitats in the area that may support a large percentage of perennials [34]. While the highest percentages of chamaephytes and hemicryptophytes seem to be a tool of adaptation against drought, salinity, sand accumulation, and grazing [35].

It is evident by comparing the flora of the investigated wadis that Wadi Hagul had the largest number of species. Wadi Hagul is considered to be an attractive environment for various plants, including a number of endangered and threatened ones, more than any other wadis in the study area.

In response to physiographic features, harsh climatic conditions, and human activities, specific plant communities, species composition, variety, and cover are bioindicators for the consistency and conservation status assessment of desert ecosystems [10].In the current study, the collection sites are classified by TWINSPAN to five main assemblages namely; Zygophyllum coccineum –Haloxylon salicornicum assemblage, Zilla spinosa - Zygophyllum coccineum assemblage, Zygophyllum coccineum-Tamarix nilotica assemblage, Tamarix nilotica – Phargmites australis assemblage and Tamarix nilotica – Chenopodium murale assemblage. These assemblages agreed somehow. These assemblages agreed somehow with Abdelaal [10] and Mashaly [6] as they showed the dominance of Zygophllum coccineum and Zilla spinosa in their clusters.

The plants assemblages of the current study varied from those of the others because they targeted Wadi Hagul only, representing 41% of this study area of this study.

The DCA ordination demonstrated that the distribution of plants was impacted in both positive and negative ways by physical and chemical analysis, and this agreed Mashaly [6].

Zygophyllum coccineum dominated on three assemblages due to its amazing ability to inhabit a wide range of soil types and occupy various habitats. In the plains and limestone wadies of the Eastern desert, the plant is widely distributed and tolerant of saline soils [36]. Moreover, Zilla spinosa is tolerant of drought, even during extremely hot months. Because it tends to raise its soluble sugar content in response to heat or water stress, producing a significant amount of osmotic potential [37]. So, their high tolerance agrees to the high silt, sand, and CaCO3% level that represented the first and second assemblages.

Tamarix nilotica dominated two assemblages and Phargmites australis dominated only one assemblage due to their salt and drought tolerance [9]. Thus, their high resistance to drought and salinity corresponds to the highest values of EC, which represents the fourth assemblage. On the other hand, the study area displayed the recruitment of some introduced species in very limited presence, such as Chenopodium murale, Chenopodium album, Chenopodium ficifolium, Cenchrus biflorus, Malva parviflora, Portulaca oleracea, Melilotus indicus and Lysimachia arvensis. The reason for this is the presence of a water source very near them (Fig. 8). Moreover, their presence is dangerous for biodiversity and natural resources, especially in dry environments. Effective invaders frequently show adaptation, flourishing in a variety of habitats. Features of the plant shoot and root system are considered morphological requirements for the invasion to be successful in different environments. Moreover, allelopathic chemicals are found in many invasive species, which allow them to dominate plant populations [13].

Fig. 8
figure 8

Showing the source of water that led to the presence of introduced species to wadi

It must be noted that these introduced species are absent in Wadi Hagul and neighboring wadis as the climate of these wadis is hyper-arid, and rainfall was very rare during the years of plant collection excursions which reflect the impact of climate change So, these results disagreed with those of Bedair et al. [13], Abdelaal [10] and agreed with Khdery et al. [11].

Cucumis melo and Solanum lycopersicum are invasive species to the Egyptian flora that has escaped from its native habitat and are growing naturally in the local flora. It has been unintentionally transferred from one area to another by humans [38], reflecting the bad impact of human interference on the native flora.

In this study, Tribulus mollis is added for the first time to the flora of Eastern desert flora, so its geographical distribution disagreed Boulos [24] who mentioned that it is located only in Sinai.

Conclusion

This study acts as evidence of the destructive impact of anthropogenic hazards (quarries, construction of roads, cement factories, summer resorts, over-collection) and a hyper-arid climate on the flora of unprotected mountainous areas facing the north-east section of the Gulf of Suez, causing it to change or disappear. These threats are also causing an increase in introduced and invasive species, which negatively impacts the density of native populations. With the help of the information obtained from this study and others about the current floristic composition losses, threats to the ecosystem, and the spatial distribution of plant communities, an effective conservation strategy and plan can be developed to try to recover and restore the endangered desert ecosystem.

Data availability

The datasets of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Tiberio Moilinga P, Robert Athian M. Impacts of Stone Quarrying on local vegetation in Mount Korok Area, Juba, Central Equatoria State, South Sudan. IntechOpen; 2023. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5772/intechopen.109707

  2. Kholdorov S, Jabbarov Z, Aslanov I, Jobborov B, Rakhmatov Z. Analysing effect of cement manufacturing industry on soils and agricultural plants. In: E3S Web of Conferences 2021. pp. 02005 – 284. EDP Sciences. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1051/e3sconf/202128402005

  3. El Hadidi MN. The main features of the natural vegetation. Flora Aegyptiaca. 2000;1(part 1):27–105.

  4. Naorem A, Jayaraman S, Dang YP, Dalal RC, Sinha NK, Rao CS, Patra AK. Soil constraints in an arid environment—challenges, prospects, and implications. Agronomy. 2023;13(1):220. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/agronomy13010220

  5. Danin. Notes on the Vegetation Near Suez and Fayid (Egypt). Isr J Bot. 1974;23:226–36.

  6. Mashaly IA. On the phytosociology of Wadi Hagul, red sea coast. Egypt J Environ Sci. 1996;12:31–54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zahran MA, Willis AJ. The vegetation of Egypt. Vol. 2. Springer Science & Business Media; 2009.

  8. Mohamed AA. A study on the Plant Diversity in Wadi Hagul, Eastren Desert. Egypt Egypt J Agricultural Sci. 2014;65(1):10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abd El-Ghani MA, Salama F, Salem B, El-Hadidy A, Abdel‐Aleem M. Biogeographical relations of a hyperarid desert flora in eastern Egypt. Afr J Ecol. 2014;52(2):173–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abdelaal M. Current status of the floristic composition in Wadi Hagul, northwest Suez Gulf, Egypt. Rend Lincei. 2017;28:81–92. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12210-016-0577-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khdery GA, Farg E, Arafat SM. Natural vegetation cover analysis in Wadi Hagul, Egypt using hyperspectral remote sensing approach. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci. 2019;22(3):253–62. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ejrs.2019.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Radi NM, Marie AH, Gafar RM, El-Swefy ZA, Abo El-Kheir ZA. Vegetation analysis, distribution of plants and chorology of some localities of northern eastern desert in Egypt. Egypt J Biotechnol. 2020;61:86–7.

  13. Bedair R, Ibrahim AA, Alyamani AA, Aloufi S, Ramadan S. Impacts of anthropogenic disturbance on Vegetation dynamics: a case study of Wadi Hagul, Eastern Desert, Egypt. Plants. 2021;10(9):1906. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/plants10091906.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Elewa HE., Groundwater in the eastern desert with reference to application of remote sensing and GIS. National authority for remote sensing & space sciences (NARSS); Engineering Applications & Water Division (EAWD); 2007. pp. 1–38.

  15. As-Suways/ Suez Climate & Temperature; 2023. http://www.suez.climatemps.com. Accessed 31 Aug. 2023.

  16. Boulos L. Flora of Egypt. Vol. 1. Al-Hadra Publishing, Cairo, Egypt; 1999.

  17. Boulos L. Flora of Egypt. Vol. 2. Cairo, Egypt: Al-Hadra Publishing; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boulos L. Flora of Egypt. Vol. 3. Cairo, Egypt: Al-Hadra Publishing; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Boulos L. Flora of Egypt. Vo. 4. Egypt: Al-Hadra Publishing Cairo; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Täckholm V. Student’s flora of Egypt. 2nd ed. Cairo: Cairo University; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zohary M, Feinbrun-Dothan N. Flora Palaestina. Jerusalem: Publisher: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanitie; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Migahid AM. Flora of Saudi Arabia. 3rd ed. Publisher:Riyadh. Saudi Arabia. University Libraries, King Saud University rev; 1978.

  23. IPNI. International Plant Names Index. Published on the Internet. The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Harvard University Herbaria & Libraries and Australian National Herbarium; 2023. http://www.ipni.org. Accessed 05 April 2023.

  24. Boulos L. Flora of Egypt checklist revised annotated edition. Al Hadara Publishing, Cairo, Egypt; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tributh H. Importance of extended clay-fractionation for the more precise characterization of soil minerals and their properties. Z fur Pflanzenernahrung Dungung Und Bodenkunde. 1970;126:117–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jackson ML. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi; 1967. p. 498.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Richards LA. Diagnosis and improvement of saline alkali soils, Agriculture, 160, handbook 60. Washington DC: US Department of Agriculture; 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. American Society of Agronomy. Soil Sci Soc America, Madison, WI, USA. 1982;4(2):167–179.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Piper CS. Soil and plant analysis. New York: Interscience Ins; 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  30. McCune B, Mefford MJ. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 4.0. Glenden Beach. OR: MJM Software Design; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mashaly IA, El-Habashy IE, Showran RA. Vegetation analysis and chorological affinities in WadiHagul. Egypt: Northeastern Desert; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Aronson JA, Whitehead EE. HALOPH. A data base of salt tolerant plants of the world; 1989.

  33. Judd WS, Ferguson IK. The genera of Chenopodiaceae in the southeastern United States. Harv Papers Bot. 1999;4(2):365–416.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Al Shaye NA, Masrahi YS, Thomas J. Ecological significance of floristic composition and life forms of Riyadh region, Central Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020;27(1):35–40. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.04.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Danin A, Orshan G. The distribution of Raunkiaer life forms in Israel in relation to the environment. J Veg Sci. 1990;1(1):41–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. El-Amier YA, El-Shora HM, Hesham M. Ecological study on Zygophyllum Coccineum L. in coastal and inland desert of Egypt. J Agric Ecol Res. 2016;6(4):1–17. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.9734/JAERI/2016/22640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Salama FM, Gadallah MAEE, Sayed SAEM, Abd El AA. E. M. adaptive mechanisms in Zilla Spinosa and Leptadenia pyrotechnica plants to sever aridity in the Egyptian deserts. Notulae Scientia Biologicae. 2016;8(4):498–510. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.15835/nsb849839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. El-Beheiry M, Hosni H, El-din S, Shaltout A, S. K., Ahmed D. Updating the checklist of the alien flora in Egypt. Taeckholmia. 2020;40(1):41–56. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.21608/taec.2020.21300.1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors thank Mohamed Arnous for his help in performing the map of collection sites, Abdo Marei Hamed for his guidance in the field tribes, and Hoda Abd-El Hamid for her help in statistical analysis.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Plants and soil samples collected by (Sara Hassanen & Yasmin Hassan], the plants identification was performed by (Elsayeda Gamal Eldin, Wafaa kamel & Sara Hassanen] and vegetation analysis was applied by (Mohamed Saad Zaghloul & Sara Hassanen]. The manuscript was written by (Sara Hassanen]. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasmin M. Hassan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The research adheres to institutional, national, and international policies and laws. All procedures were successfully carried out in compliance with the instructions.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassanen, S., Eldin, E.G., Kamel, W. et al. Floral diversity and conservation status of vascular plants in arid mountainous areas. BMC Ecol Evo 25, 3 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12862-024-02342-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12862-024-02342-y

Keywords