Skip to main content

The world’s most venomous spider is a species complex: systematics of the Sydney funnel-web spider (Atracidae: Atrax robustus)

Abstract

The Sydney funnel-web spider Atrax robustus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1877 is an iconic Australian species and considered among the most dangerously venomous spiders for humans. Originally described in 1877 from a single specimen collected in “New Holland”, this spider has a complex taxonomic history. The most recent morphological revision of funnel-web spiders (Atracidae) lists this species as both widespread and common in the Sydney Basin bioregion and beyond, roughly 250 km from the Newcastle area south to the Illawarra, and extending inland across the Blue Mountains. Morphological variability and venom diversity in this species appear to be unusually high, raising questions about species concepts and diversity in these spiders. In this study, we use a combination of molecular phylogenetics, divergence time analyses and morphology to establish the Sydney funnel-web spider as a complex of three species. The “real” Sydney funnel-web spider Atrax robustus is relatively widespread in the Sydney metropolitan region. A second species, Atrax montanus (Rainbow, 1914), which is revalidated here, overlaps but mainly occurs further south and west, and a third larger species, Atrax christenseni sp. nov., is found in a small area surrounding Newcastle to the north. The revised taxonomy for funnel-web spiders may have practical implications for antivenom production and biochemical studies on spider venoms. Although no human fatalities have occurred since the development of antivenom in the 1980s, antivenom for Sydney funnel-web spiders might be optimized by considering biological differentiation at the species level.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The Sydney funnel-web spider Atrax robustus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1877 in the family Atracidae Hogg, 1901 is arguably one of the most iconic Australian invertebrates [1,2,3,4]. These dark, glossy and large (~ 2–4 cm in body length) spiders (Fig. 1) are considered among the most dangerously venomous spiders for humans, with several deaths resulting from bites before the development of antivenom in the 1980s. This spider has also been a primary target of biochemical research on venom structure and components, including antivenom production. In fact, almost all publications on Atrax robustus deal with venom properties (e.g., [5,6,7,8]), whereas only few studies have focused on its natural history and taxonomy. The latter is a complex story because this spider was originally described from a single female specimen collected from “New Holland” (today Australia) in the 19th century [9], whereas the male was originally described under a different name from northern Sydney [10]. Both sexes were eventually matched some decades later by Musgrave [11], who was also the first to associate this spider with the death of a child in the northern Sydney suburbs, commenting on the aggressive nature of wild-caught specimens and the effects of their venom based on patient hospital records. Musgrave’s [11] observations on toxicity were confirmed by countless biomedical studies and it is now known that only male spiders of A. robustus produce venom peptides that cause serious effects in humans [5,6,7,8, 12]. This is unfortunate since male spiders mature in summer and abandon their burrows, usually after rainy periods, to roam in search of mates, often bringing them into contact with humans [13].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Live photos of female Atrax robustus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1877, West Pennant Hills, New South Wales, Australia, in rearing position (A) and dorsal view (B) (photos B. Jones)

Many more species of funnel-web spiders have been described over the years since Musgrave [11]. Main [14] listed six species of Atrax O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1877 from eastern Australia but updated the number to eleven species only two decades later [15]. Main’s [15] latter catalog included Atrax montanus (Rainbow, 1914), which was synonymised with A. robustus by Gray [16], and several other species that were eventually transferred to its sister genus Hadronyche L. Koch, 1873. Main [14] not only reiterated the venomous nature of this species, but also provided a description of its ‘funnel’ webs and natural habitats (Fig. 2). The most comprehensive taxonomic analysis of funnel-webs in Australia was published by Gray [17], who recognized three genera of Australian funnel-web spiders based on somatic and genital morphology, namely Atrax for three species from New South Wales, the Australian Capital Territory and Victoria; Hadronyche for 31 species from eastern Australia, South Australia and Tasmania (although another species has since been described, bringing the total number of Hadronyche species to 32) [18]; and the monotypic Illawarra Gray, 2010 from the Illawarra region of New South Wales [18]. These three genera differ in male morphology, with Atrax males bearing a prominent conical spur on the tibia of leg II and a flat cephalic region in lateral view. Hadronyche males lack the prominent conical spur and have a raised cephalic region, and Illawarra males lack the spur and have a flat cephalic region [17]. Within Atrax, Gray [17] defined three species primarily based on characteristics of the male embolus, the tip of the copulatory organ, which is used for sperm transfer, and spination features of the male palpal tibia. Atrax robustus sensu Gray, 2010 is considered a widespread but morphologically variable species with a linear range of ca. 250 km along the coastline and stretching inland past the Blue Mountains; Atrax yorkmainorum Gray, 2010 is a subalpine species that is widely distributed in the high plains of the Australian Alps (New South Wales, Australian Capital Territory); and Atrax sutherlandi Gray, 2010 is distributed in temperate forests in southern New South Wales and northern Victoria (Fig. 3). Gray [17] alluded to the preliminary nature of his species concepts noting that A. robustusspecimens from the Hunter Valley/Newcastle region are typically larger than other individuals”. A subsequent genetic study on A. sutherlandi also noted substantial genetic variation between spatially isolated populations, perhaps indicating speciation in the latter [19]. No taxonomic studies at the species level have been published since 2011, although recent phylogenomic studies have classified all Australian funnel-web spiders in their own family (Atracidae Hogg, 1901) and in a sister-relationship with Actinopodidae Simon, 1892 (distributed in Australia and South America) whose males also produce potent venoms. These two families are considered the “venom clade” of mygalomorph spiders [20,21,22].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Habitat of Atrax O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1877 species. A. Atrax montanus (Rainbow, 1914), forest habitat in Blue Mountains. B. Atrax christenseni sp. nov., near Newcastle, burrow under rock. C, D. Atrax robustus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1877, burrow under rock (C), and female with spiderlings (D). Photo credit: (A) H. Smith/Australian Museum, Sydney; (B, C) D. Harms; (D) B. Jones

Fig. 3
figure 3

Distribution of Atrax O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1877. Records of Atrax robustus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1877, Atrax montanus (Rainbow, 1914) and Atrax christenseni sp. nov. based on examined material in the present study; ranges for Atrax yorkmainorum Gray, 2010 and Atrax sutherlandi Gray, 2010 and Atrax robustus sensu Gray, 2010 in Australia following Gray [17]. Distribution maps were created using QGIS v.3.14.16 (https://www.qgis.org) by superimposing locality records on elevation data ([23]: GMTED2010; https://www.usgs.gov/coastal-changes-and-impacts/gmted2010); lakes and rivers from Geoscience Australia [24]; and borders and coastlines from Natural Earth (https://www.naturalearthdata.com)

Since Gray [17], the original concept of A. robustus as a widespread species in the Sydney Basin and beyond was never challenged. The need to review the species concept for A. robustus came, in part, from anecdotal evidence of high venom variation and unusually large males that were delivered to the Australian Museum in Sydney and the Australian Reptile Park in Somersby. Antivenom is typically produced from male Sydney funnel-web spiders that are collected during the breeding season by amateur collectors and donated to the Australian Reptile Park, where venoms are extracted. Some of these males were later deposited in the Australian Museum in Sydney, which holds the largest historical collection of funnel-web spiders in the world. Using these collections, newly collected specimens, and Gray’s [17] revision as a baseline, we aimed to: (i) re-assess the taxonomy of A. robustus across its distribution via molecular phylogenetic and morphological analyses; (ii) establish the taxonomic status of unusually large-bodied Atrax populations near Newcastle [17]; and (iii) identify other species of Atrax that may have been previously confused with A. robustus.

Materials and methods

Material examined

Material examined in the present study is deposited in the following natural history collections: the Australian Museum, Sydney, Australia (AMS); Museum of Nature Hamburg – Zoology (ZMH), Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Hamburg, Germany; and the Natural History Museum, London, U.K. (BMNH). Specimens used only for morphological analysis include: the types of Atrax robustus, Euctimena tibialis Rainbow, 1914 and Poikilomorphia montana Rainbow, 1914; a male of A. yorkmainorum (ZMH-A0024106) from Bago, New South Wales; two females (ZMH-A0016609, ZMH-A0024181) of A. sutherlandi from the type locality (Bermagui, southern New South Wales); and 59 males and 65 females of A. robustus sensu Gray, 2010 from across this species’ distribution. Specimens used for DNA analysis were acquired from the Australian Reptile Park, Somersby, New South Wales via several private collectors (later deposited in both the AMS and ZMH), and through a 2020 field survey in the Sydney Basin bioregion and Newcastle under permit number SL102329 (Department of Planning, Industry and Environment, New South Wales Government). Juvenile specimens were preserved directly in 100% ethanol and stored at −80 °C in ultra-freezers for tissue preservation; for adult specimens, the third left leg was removed and transferred to 100% ethanol, whereas the body was preserved in 75% ethanol and used for morphological examination.

Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from 57 Atrax and 8 Hadronyche specimens using the E.Z.N.A. Tissue DNA kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, U.S.A.), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Three molecular markers were optimized for Sanger sequencing including: a fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene (primers LCO-1490: [25], and HCOoutout: [26]) to resolve shallow nodes, the mitochondrial ribosomal 16S gene (primers 16Sbr and 16Sar: [27]) for less shallow nodes, and a fragment of the nuclear ribosomal 28S gene (28Sa: [28], and LSUR: [29]) to resolve deeper nodes. PCR cleanup was performed using Exonuclease 1 and FastAP (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, U.S.A.), and uni-directional sequencing was done through Macrogen Europe B.V. (Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Sequences were checked for contamination using BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) on the NCBI server, and then edited according to IUPAC codes and checked for stop codons in Geneious v.2020.2.4 (Biomatters Limited, Auckland, New Zealand). All sequences generated in this study are deposited on Genbank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank; Table S1); additional outgroup sequences were also downloaded from Genbank (Table S1).

Phylogenetic analyses

A molecular matrix was compiled to perform phylogenetic analysis of Atrax robustus sensu Gray, 2010. The ingroup comprised 59 Atrax terminals including two terminals of Atrax sutherlandi [19], and 57 terminals of A. robustus sensu Gray, 2010 from 45 localities across much of its distribution (Table S1): the Sydney Basin bioregion, the areas around the northern (Newcastle) and southern (Illawarra) distributional limits, and the foothills of the Blue Mountains to the west (Fig. 3). No sequences of A. yorkmainorum were available. The outgroup dataset comprised sixteen terminals including one terminal of Atypoidea, which the tree was rooted on; and fifteen terminals of Avicularioidea with taxa chosen according to recent phylogenies for mygalomorph spiders [20,21,22]: eight terminals of Hadronyche (the putative sister-genus of Atrax), two terminals of Actinopodidae (the sister-family of Atracidae), one terminal of Domiothelina, and two terminals each of Nemesioidina and Theraphosoidina (Table S1). All sequences were aligned using MAFFT v.7.429 [30, 31] on the CIPRES Science Gateway v.3.3 ([32]: https://www.phylo.org) applying L-INS-i for all loci, and aligned sequences were checked in Mesquite v.3.5 [33]. Aligned molecular markers were concatenated into a single phylogenetic dataset with the dataset partitioned by locus for a total of 75 terminals with 3814 aligned bp. Ingroup sequences were also re-aligned separately to calculate mean interspecific and intraspecific pairwise genetic distances in MEGA11 v.11.0.13 [34].

Phylogenetic analyses were carried out using both Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) approaches. A ML analysis was performed in RAxML-HPC2 v.8.2.12 [35, 36] on CIPRES applying either the GTRGAMMA or GTRCAT model to search for the best scoring ML tree with 1000 rapid bootstrap iterations [36]. The BI analysis was performed in MrBayes v.3.2.7a [37] on CIPRES after inferring twenty-four substitution models for each gene in jModelTest2 v.2.1.6 [38, 39] on CIPRES, and choosing the best-fit model based on the Akaike Information Criterion. Four Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations were run for 25 million generations starting from random trees, sampling every 1000 generations, using a burn-in of 25% for tree-building, and a split frequency < 0.01 to assess chain convergence.

Divergence time estimation analyses

Divergence times among Atrax populations were estimated using BEAST v.1.10.4 [40, 41] on CIPRES with .xml files generated in BEAUTI v.1.10.4 using the compiled phylogenetic dataset described above. The dataset was partitioned by locus except for COI which was partitioned by codon position. Site and clock models were unlinked and the tree model linked across loci. Site models for each locus were chosen using the Bayesian Information Criterion from jModelTest2, and an uncorrelated lognormal molecular clock was applied to all clock models. A birth-death tree prior was applied to the tree model. Since there are no Atracidae fossils, we estimated divergence times via two methods. (i) Considering a dated tree of Mygalomorphae [22], a normal distribution (µ = 155 Ma, σ = 4 Ma) was applied to the split between Nemesioidina and Theraphosoidina. (ii) After testing several arthropod molecular clocks for COI and 16S including Brower [42], Papadopoulou et al. [43], Bidegaray-Batista et al. [44], Abel et al. [45] and Monjaraz-Ruedas et al. [46], the Brower [42] rate for COI (µ = 0.0115, σ = 0.0001), and broad uniform priors for 16S (ucld.min = 0.002, ucld.max = 0.5) and 28S (ucld.min = 0.0001, ucld.max = 0.01), were chosen as the preferred clock rates. Two MCMC chains with different starting seed values were initiated and each chain ran for 500 million generations. Tracer v.1.72 [47] was used to assess convergence of the two chains and to check whether the Effective Sample Size (ESS) for all parameters was above 200. Tree files were combined using Log Combiner after removing 25% of burn-in from each chain, and the maximum clade credibility tree was obtained using Tree Annotator.

Morphological work

Specimens deposited in the ZMH and the holotype of A. robustus were examined using a Leica M125 dissection microscope and images were taken using a custom-made BK Plus System (Dun Inc, Palmyra, PA, U.S.A.) with an integrated Canon camera, a macro lens (65 mm), and Zerene stacking software, v.1.04 (Zerene Systems LLC 2018, Richard, WA, U.S.A.). Digital photos were used to trace proportions and measurements. Female genitalia were excised using a sharp entomological needle, washed in distilled water, digested with Pancreatin solution, cleared in lactic acid and observed under a Leica DM 2500 LED compound microscope, with images taken as above.

The types of Euctimena tibialis and Poikilomorphia montana, and other historical AMS specimens, were examined under an Olympus XZX-16 microscope, with measurements taken using an eyepiece graticule to 0.1 mm accuracy. Internal genitalia of P. montana were digested with Proteinase K and imaged using a Leica system comprising a M205A microscope, DFC 500 camera and LAS 3.8 stacking software (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Photographs of the dorsal and ventral habitus of P. montana were taken with a Canon 600D MkII camera and a Laowa 100 mm macro lens. Images were combined using Helicon Focus (HeliconSoft, Kharkiv, Ukraine) and post-image processing carried out with Topaz AI Sharpen (Topaz Labs, Dallas, TX, U.S.A.).

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging of male genital structures was achieved by dehydration using ethanol solution from 70 to 100% and subsequent transfer to Hexamethyldisilizane (HMDS 99%) for 3 h. The Hitachi Tabletop Microscope TM 4000 Plus (Hitachi, Germany branch) at the ZMH was used for imaging after mounting the structures on a standard SEM stub. All measurements are given in millimetres (mm); total length = carapace length + opisthosoma length.

Locality data for older specimens was georeferenced and such coordinates are indicated in square brackets. To protect species from overharvesting, GPS coordinates are presented only to the nearest minute, or completely obscured for the Newcastle species. Distribution maps were created using QGIS v.3.14.16 (https://www.qgis.org) by superimposing locality records on elevation data ([23]: GMTED2010; https://www.usgs.gov/coastal-changes-and-impacts/gmted2010); lakes and rivers from Geoscience Australia [24]; and borders and coastlines from Natural Earth (https://www.naturalearthdata.com). The new species is registered on ZooBank (http://zoobank.org/). In the following sections, we provide the results of the phylogenetic analyses before we use these data to inform the taxonomic hypotheses and evaluate morphological differentiation within a molecular context.

Results

Molecular results

ML and BI phylogenetic trees were largely congruent with minor differences observed in outgroup topology and intraspecific relationships. Atrax was recovered as monophyletic with high bootstrap support (100%; Fig. S1). Within Atrax, A. sutherlandi formed a monophyletic group (96%) sister to A. robustus sensu Gray, 2010, which was in turn split into three reciprocally monophyletic groups with mostly high bootstrap/posterior probability values (BT/PP). These three molecular clades correspond to quantifiable levels of morphological divergence and we describe them as distinct species below: A. robustus (redefined here; BT/PP: 92%/0.99), A. montanus (re-validated here; 45%/0.69), and A. christenseni sp. nov. (100%/0.99). Atrax robustus was sister to A. montanus with high support (81%/0.99), and A. christenseni formed a clade sister to (A. robustus + A. montanus).

Genetic variation within A. robustus sensu Gray, 2010 was found to be geographically structured, with specimens from neighbouring localities being more similar genetically. Mean interspecific pairwise genetic distances were recovered as follows: 13.2% (COI) and 7.1% (16S) between A. montanus and A. christenseni; 13.5% (COI) and 8.5% (16S) between A. christenseni and A. robustus; and 10.1% (COI) and 4.8% (16S) between A. robustus and A. montanus. Mean intraspecific genetic distances were recovered as: 1.3% (COI) and 0.8% (16S) for A. christenseni; 5.8% (COI) and 2.4% (16S) for A. montanus; and 2.6% (COI) and 1.7% (16S) for A. robustus. Mean inter- and intraspecific pairwise differences for 28S were < 0.0% across all species.

The topology of the divergence time tree was similar to ML and BI trees (Fig. 4). All ESS values were above 100 and only two parameters (28S.ucld.mean/28S.coefficientofvariation) had ESS values below 200. According to the dated tree, Atrax diverged from Hadronyche in the Late Cretaceous (72 Ma, 95% HPD: 115–40 Ma). Speciation within Atrax began in the Oligocene (30 Ma; 95% HPD: 54–14 Ma), whereas diversification of each Atrax species began in the late Miocene (13–2 Ma).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Dated phylogeny of Atrax O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1877 based on BEAST analysis of 75 terminals and three genetic markers (COI, 16S and 28S) for a total of 3814 aligned bp. Divergence dates and 95% HPD bars indicated at nodes. Geological time scale includes the following periods: Permian, Triassic, Jurassic, Cretaceous, Paleogene and Neogene/Quaternary (Neo/Quat)

Morphological and combined results

Genitalic morphology of both males and females supports the molecular findings and fills in the geographical gaps in molecular sampling (Figs. 3 and 5). Atrax robustus (64 specimen examinations and 35 terminals/26 localities) is found both north and south of Sydney Harbour across the northern and southern Sydney Basin bioregion. Atrax montanus (44 specimen examinations and 17 terminals/14 localities) occurs primarily west and south of A. robustus, with records reaching as far south as Stanwell Tops and extending west into the Blue Mountains and some into Central Coast locations. Atrax robustus and A. montanus overlap in distribution in several areas and we found some specimens (particularly females) from overlap regions to possess genitalia that are somewhat intermediate between A. robustus and A. montanus, suggesting that hybridization may occur. Atrax christenseni included nineteen specimen examinations and five terminals from five localities, and was the most northerly distributed species with all samples collected from a 25 km radius around Newcastle.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Diagnostic characters of Atrax O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1877 species, including male bulb and embolus (A–C) in lateral view, and female spermathecae (D–F) in dorsal view. A, D. Atrax robustus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1877: A. ♂ (ZMH-A0013030), Mona Vale; D. Holotype ♀ (BMNH). B, E. Atrax montanus (Rainbow, 1914): B. ♂ (AMS KS.131647), Symbio; E. ♀ (ZMH-A0012999), Symbio. C, F. Atrax christenseni sp. nov.: C. Holotype ♂ (AMS KS.131644); F. Allotype ♀ (AMS KS.131645). Scale bars = 0.5 mm. Annotations indicate measurement points for diagnostic ratios

Systematics

Infraorder Mygalomorphae Pocock, 1892.

Family Atracidae Hogg, 1901.

Genus Atrax O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1877.

Atrax robustus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1877

Figures 1, 2C and D, 3, 4, 5A and D, 6, 7, 8, 9, 17A, C and E and 18A and B.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Atrax robustus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1877, dorsal (A, C) and ventral (B, D) habitus. A, B. Holotype ♀ (BMNH). C, D. ♀ (ZMH-A0013037), Hornsby. Scale bars = 5.0 mm

Fig. 7
figure 7

Atrax robustus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1877, female internal genitalia, dorsal (A, C, E), ventral (B, D, F) views. A, B. ♀ (ZMH-A0013011), Asquith. C, D. ♀ (ZMH-A0013014), Terrey Hills. E, F. ♀ (ZMH-A0013037), Hornsby. Scale bars = 0.5 mm

Fig. 8
figure 8

Atrax robustus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1877, Mona Vale, ♂ (ZMH-A0013030), dorsal (A) and ventral (B) habitus, eyes (C), labium and endites (D), male leg II (tibia, metatarsus and tarsus), retrolateral view (E). Scale bars: A, B = 5.0 mm; E = 1.0 mm

Fig. 9
figure 9

Atrax robustus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1877, Mona Vale, ♂ (ZMH-A0013030). A, B. Palp, prolateral (A) and retrolateral (B) views. C–E. Bulb and embolus, prolateral (C), ventral (D) and retrolateral (E) views. Scale bars: A–E = 0.5 mm

Atrax robustus O. Pickard-Cambridge [9]: 27, pl. 6, f. 1 (description female); Hogg [48]: 273, f. 39 (female); Musgrave [11]: 33; Main [14]: 40–42, f. A–F (male); Nishikawa [49]: 179, f. 1–4 (male); Main [15]: 41; Gray [50]: 441, pl. 7; Gray [51]: 314; Gray [16]: 114, 115 (in part); Gray [17]: 299, f. 1A, C, 4A–H, 5A–G, 6A–K (male and female, in part).

Euctimena tibialis Rainbow [10]: 249, f. 58–60 (description male) (synonymised by Musgrave [11]: 34, 37, 38).

Type Material. AUSTRALIA: Atrax robustus: Holotype ♀ (BMNH) (formerly dried, now in 75% ethanol), 71 Neu Holland [Australia] [examined]. New South Wales: Euctimena tibialis: Holotype ♂ (AMS KS.4092), Turramurra [33º44’S 151º08’E], obtained from under a log [examined].

Material Examined. AUSTRALIA: New South Wales: Ashfield [33º53’S 151º07’E], Sydney, 20 Dec. 1930, E. Hudson, 1♀ (AMS KS.4930); Asquith [33º41’S 151º06’E], 2 Nov. 2018, K. Christensen, 1♀ (ZMH-A0013011); Avoca Beach [33º28’S 151º26’E], 20 Sept. 1968, N. Tweedale, 1♀ (AMS KS.5017); Balmain [33°52’S 151°11’E], Sydney, Jan. 1996, 1♂ (AMS KS.45611); Bankstown [33°55’S 151°02’E], P. Finn, 1♀ (AMS KS.4943), 14 Apr. 1965, 1♂ (AMS KS.4902); Baulkham Hills [33º46’S 150º59’E], 19 Jan. 1973, M. Gray, 1♀ (AMS KS.5139), 17 Mar. 2020, K. Christensen, 1♀ (ZMH-A0013024); Beecroft [33º46’S 151º03’E], dug out of the ground, 25 Apr. 2020, B. Jones, 1♀ (ZMH-A0013019), 26 Apr. 2020, B. Jones, 1♂ (ZMH-A0013021); Berowra Valley National Park, Benowie Walking Track, 33º40’S 151º05’E, hand collected, 71 m, 17 Mar. 2020, D. Harms & H. Smith, 1juv. (ZMH-A0013062); Bidjigal [Biddigal] Reserve, 33º45’S 151º01’E, 11 Jan. 2020, B. Jones, 1juv. (ZMH-A013043); Bilgoa Plateau [33º38’S 151º19’E], 27 Jan. 2020, K. Christensen, 1♂ (ZMH-A0013012); Bilpin [33º30’S 150º31’E], K. Christensen, 1juv. (ZMH-A0013061), 17 Jan. 1930, E.M. Hunt, 1♂ (AMS KS.1148); Brookvale [33º46’S 151º16’E], K. Christensen, 1♀ (ZMH-A0013015); Central Coast, 1♀ (AMS KS.130960); Central Coast area, 24 Oct. 2019, K. Christensen, 1♂ (ZMH-A0012986); Clifton Gardens [33°50’S 151°15’E], Sydney, 20 Jun. 1927, C.A. Monticone, 1♂ (AMS KS.4378); Cook St. Trail, 33º46’S 151º13’E, 15 Jan. 2020, B. Jones, 1♀ (ZMH-A0012988), 1juv. (ZMH-A0013052); Cumberland State Forest, 33º45’S 151º02’E, 10 Jan. 2020, B. Jones, 1juv. (ZMH-A0013053); Deep Creek Reserve, 33º43’S 151º16’E, 15 Jan. 2020, B. Jones, 1♀ (ZMH-A0012977), 1juv. (ZMH-A0013042); Dural [33°41’S 151°02’E], Mar. 1981, 1♂ (AMS KS.7470); Elizabeth Bay [33º52’S 151º14’E], Sydney, 9 Jan. 1958, F. Siider, 1♀ (AMS KS.4989), 5 May 1981, D.T. Cave, 1♂ (AMS KS.7477); Galston [33º39’S 151º03’E], 16 Feb. 1986, G. Jackson, 1♀ (AMS KS.16443), 19 Apr. 2019, K. Christensen, 1♀ (ZMH-A0013016); Galston Gorge [33°40’S 151°05’E], 25 May 2003, 1♂ (AMS KS.88193); Garigal National Park, 33º43’S 151º11’E, 15 Jan. 2020, B. Jones, 2juvs. (ZMH-A0013047, ZMH-A0013049); Gordon [33º45’S 151º09’E], 29 Apr. 1973, J. Buist, 1♀ (AMS KS.5142); Glenning Valley [32°21’S 151°25’E], 1♂ (AMS KS.128227); Gosford [33º26’S 151º21’E], 1♂ (AMS KS.52486), 9 Jun. 2019, K. Christensen, 1♂ (ZMH-A0013001), 1981, 1♂ (AMS KS.8543); Grays Point [34°04’S 151°05’E], Jun. 1992, K. Swarbrick, 1♂ (AMS KS.31961); Hornsby [33º42’S 151º06’E], 31 Mar. 1941, 1♀ (AMS KS.4363), 2 Feb. 1996, 1♀ (AMS KS.48998), 3 Oct. 2019, K. Christensen, 1♀ (ZMH-A0013037), Hornsby Hospital [33º42’S 151º07’E], 7 Aug. 2018, K. Christensen, 1♀ (ZMH-A0013004), 4 Sept. 2018, K. Christensen, 1♀ (ZMH-A0013010), 28 Jun. 2019, K. Christensen, 1♀ (ZMH-A0013009); via Hornsby Hospital [33º42’S 151º07’E], 10 Dec. 2019, K. Christensen, 1♀ (ZMH-A0012985); Hornsby Heights [33°40’S 151°06’E], 5 Mar. 1977, A. Young, 1♂ (AMS KS.661); Hurstville [33°58’S 151°06’E], 5 Jun. 1972, A. Osten, 1♂ (AMS KS.4949), 2 Dec. 1993, N. Parsons, 1♀ (AMS KS.40633); Hurstville Sth [33°58’S 151°06’E], 8 Nov. 1971, G. Dwyet, 1♂ (AMS KS.4928); Kilcare Beach [Kilcare, 33º32’S 151º22’E], Gosford area, 4 Oct. 1977, F. Bradfield, 1♀ (AMS KS.3610); Kincumber [33°28’S 151°24’E], 16 Feb. 1978, B. Valentine, 1♂ (AMS KS.50289); Ku-ring-gai Chase National Park, 33º40’S 151º13’E, 15 Jan. 2020, B. Jones, 1♀ (ZMH-A0012997), 1juv. (ZMH-A0012980); Kurrajong Heights [33º31’S 150º38’E], 24 Feb. 1980, 1♀ (AMS KS.4622); Lakemba [33°55’S 151°04’E], 7 Jan. 1948, 1♂ (AMS KS.4944); Lane Cove [33º49’S 151º10’E], 14 Jul. 1930, Lee, 1♀ (AMS KS.4407), 5 Feb. 1934, R. Cooney, 1♀ (AMS KS.4398), 24 May 1973, L. Mackiewicz, 1♀ (AMS KS.5143), 21 May 1993, Ryden, 1♂ (AMS KS.35086); Lane Cove National Park, 33º46’S 151º06’E, 10 Jan. 2020, B. Jones, 1juv. (ZMH-A0013050); Lindfield [33º47’S 151º10’E], 29 Sept.1962, M. Gregg & V. Gregg, 1♀ (AMS KS.5031); Manly [33º48’S 151º17’E], 7 Apr. 1930, T. Iredale, 1♀ (AMS KS.4866); Matcham [33º25’S 151º26’E], brick pile, 30 Jun. 2020, K. Christensen, 1♂ (ZMH-A0013002), 18 Oct. 2020, K. Christensen, 1♂ (AMS KS.130966); Matraville South [33º58’S 151º14’E], 20 Oct. 1952, A. Brown, 1♀ (AMS KS.4907); Meadowbank [33º49’S 151º05’E], Mar. 1963, R.H. Hall, 1♀ (AMS KS.4238); Mona Vale Vet [Mona Vale Vet Hospital, 33º41’S 151º18’E], 11 Mar. 2020, K. Christensen, 1♂ (ZMH-A0013030); Mosman [33º50’S 151º15’E], North Sydney, 1♂ (AMS KS.4193 – labeled “compared with type” of Euctimena tibialis); Mosman [33º50’S 151º15’E], 1 Dec. 1930, A. Gould, 1♀ (AMS KS.4237); Mt. Colah [33°40’S 151°07’E], 10 Jun. 1996, 1♂ (AMS KS.45840); Neutral Bay [33°50’S 151°13’E], 1♂ (AMS KS.4009); Parramatta [33°49’S 151°00’E], 25 Mar. 1959, W.G. Ashford, 1♂ (AMS KS.4950); Pymble [33°45’S 151°08’E], 29 Jan. 1993, 1♂ (AMS KS.34398); Roseville [33º47’S 151º10’E], 17 Sept. 1952, A. Simpson, 1♀ (AMS KS.4861); Scotland Island [33º38’S 151º17’E], K. Christensen, 1♀ (ZMH-A0012983), 29 May 1970, C. Mclean, 1♀ (AMS KS.4379), 23 Nov. 2018, K. Christensen 1♀ (ZMH-A0012976); Stanmore [33°54’S 151°10’E], 1949, Jany, 1♂ (AMS KS.4922); Sydney University, Macleay Bldg [33º53’S 151º11’E], 7 Feb. 1985, R. Bradley, 1♀ (AMS KS.50024); Tascott [33°27’S 151°19’E], 1 Nov. 2020, K. Christensen, 1♂ (AMS KS.130962); Telopea [33°48’S 151°03’E], 25 Apr. 1971, K.P. Reid, 1♂ (AMS KS.4971); Terry Hills [Terrey Hills, 33º41’S 151º13’E], 20 Sept. 2019, K. Christensen, 1♀ (ZMH-A0013014); Terrey Hills [33º41’S 151º13’E], 15 Jul. 2020, K. Christensen, 1♀ (ZMH-A0013018); Terrigal [33º27’S 151º27’E], 27 Sept. 2019, K. Christensen, 1♀ (ZMH-A0013038); Wahroonga [33°43’S 151°07’E], 16 Mar. 1930, 1♂ (AMS KS.4028); Warrawee [33º44’S 151º07’E], 9 Apr. 1961, M. Gregg, 1♀ (AMS KS.5032); Waverley [33°54’S 151°15’E], 15 May 1973, Gibson, 1♂ (AMS KS.5146), 3 Jul. 1973, R. Stewart, 1♂ (AMS KS.4972); West Pennant Hills [33º45’S 151º02’E], 15 May 1973, S. Zucker, 1♀ (AMS KS.5130); West Pennant Hills, 33º45’S 151º03’E, hand collected, 111 m, 19 Mar. 2020, D. Harms & B. Buzatto, 1juv. (ZMH-A0013063); Winston Hills [33º47’S 150º59’E], 6 Sept. 1972, J. Deviana, 1♀ (AMS KS.5148), 11 Apr. 1973, J. Deviana & V. Gregg, 1♀ (AMS KS.5133), 4 Apr. 1974, J. Deviana & V. Gregg, 1♂ (AMS KS.5152); Wollongong [34º26’S 150º53’E], Jul. 1974, B. Purdy, 1♀ (AMS KS.5012); Wollstonecraft [33°50’S 151°12’E], 27 Jan. 1993, 1♂ (AMS KS.34392); Wyoming Vet [Wyoming, 33º24’S 151º22’E], 4 Apr. 2020, K. Christensen, 1♂ (ZMH-A0013057); Yagoona [33º54’S 151º01’E], Feb. 1981, 1♀ (AMS KS.8295).

Diagnosis. Adult males of A. robustus differ from all congeners by the following combination of characters: carapace length x̅ 10.2 (8.9–13.4); palpal tibia short, 2x longer than wide (Fig. 9); embolus short (6.5x longer than wide) and with smooth curvature (Figs. 5A and 17A, C and E). Males can be further distinguished from A. montanus by their shorter embolus (6.5x longer than wide) and wider embolus tip opening (Figs. 5A and 17A, C and E), while in the latter, the embolus is longer (8x longer than wide) and the embolus tip opening is narrower (Figs. 5B and 17B, D and F); from A. christenseni sp. nov. by the shorter and broader embolus (6.5x longer than wide), while 12x longer than wide in the latter (Fig. 5C); from A. sutherlandi by their embolus longer than the palpal tibia and smoothly curved vs. embolus shorter than palpal tibia and strongly curved (see Gray [17]: fig. 12G); and from A. yorkmainorum by the slightly twisted embolus tip that is strongly twisted in the latter ([17]: fig. 10A). Adult females of A. robustus differ from all other species by the following combination of characters: carapace length x̅ 11.9 (9.0–14.5); spermathecae straight, 4–5x longer than wide. In A. sutherlandi the spermathecae are 3x longer than wide (see Gray [17]: fig. 13F). Atrax robustus and A. montanus are generally smaller species than A. christenseni sp. nov.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Atrax montanus (Rainbow, 1914), dorsal (A, C) and ventral (B, D) habitus. A, B. Holotype ♀ (AMS KS.1039). C, D. ♀ (AMS KS.131640), Stanwell Tops. Scale bars = 5.0 mm

Description. Male (ZMH-A0013030). Total length: 25.14; carapace length: 13.35; carapace width: 9.17; abdomen length: 11.80 (Fig. 8). Colouration (in ethanol): Carapace, endites and sternum dark brown; chelicerae dark brown; abdomen dark grey; legs dark brown. Carapace: Broadly oval, pars cephalica slightly elevated; fovea transverse, procurved. Endites: With ~ 289 cuspules. Labium: With ~ 379 cuspules. Eyes: Eye formula 4:4; ocular quadrangle rectangular; AME separated by 1.3x their own diameter; PME separated by 2.1x own diameter. Sternum: Longer than wide; three pairs of ovoid sigilla, posterior pair the largest. Chelicerae: Rastellum absent; promargin with 15 teeth, retromargin with 16 teeth, furrow with 32 denticles. Leg measurements: I 31.01 (8.52/3.79/7.18/7.03/4.49); II 27.75 (7.42/3.56/6.93/6.17/3.67); III 22.89 (6.44/3.02/4.91/5.00/3.52); IV 30.21 (7.89/3.78/6.99/7.10/4.55). Abdomen: Ovoid; with four spinnerets. Genitalia: Palpal tibia 4.48/2.06; bulb 5.45/1.38. Palpal tibia with four macrosetae prolateral; 2x longer than wide; embolus 6.5x longer than wide; smooth curvature; embolus tip with small flap and pointed tip (Figs. 9, 17A, C and E and 18A and B).

Female Holotype (BMNH). Total length: 27.87; carapace length: 13.98; carapace width: 10.29; abdomen length: 13.89 (Fig. 6). Colouration (in ethanol specimen desiccated): Carapace and legs reddish; chelicerae reddish-brown; abdomen brown; sternum reddish-brown; labium and endites reddish-brown with black cuspules. Carapace: Broadly oval; pars cephalica slightly elevated; fovea transverse, slightly procurved. Endites: ~274 cuspules. Labium: ~351 cuspules. Sternum: Longer than wide; three pairs of ovoid sigilla; posterior pair of sigilla largest, anterior pairs much smaller, subequal. Chelicerae: Rastellum absent; promargin with 14 teeth, retromargin with 17 teeth, furrow with ~ 16 denticles. Eyes: Eye formula 4:4; ocular quadrangle rectangular; AME separated by 1x their own diameter; PME separated 3.2x by their own diameter. Leg measurements: Too damaged. Abdomen: Ovoid; with four spinnerets. Genitalia: Internal genitalia with two long spermathecae (4x longer than wide), straight (Fig. 7).

Female (ZMH-A0013037). Total length: 27.50; carapace length: 11.55: carapace width: 9.67; abdomen length: 15.95 (Fig. 6). Colouration (in ethanol): Carapace, endites and sternum dark reddish-brown; chelicerae dark brown; abdomen dark grey; legs dark reddish-brown. Carapace: Broadly oval, pars cephalica slightly elevated; fovea transverse, procurved. Endites: With ~ 290 cuspules. Labium: With ~ 349 cuspules. Eyes: Eye formula 4:4; ocular quadrangle rectangular; AME separated by 1.1x their own diameter; PME separated by 3x own diameter. Sternum: Longer than wide; three pairs of ovoid sigilla, posterior pair the largest. Chelicerae: Rastellum absent; promargin with 14 teeth, retromargin with 15 teeth, furrow with 22 denticles. Leg measurements: I 28.45 (8.22/3.79/6.18/6.03/4.23); II 27.28 (7.44/3.58/6.17/6.07/4.02); III 22.77 (6.32/3.02/4.90/4.56/3.97); IV 27.19 (7.85/3.15/5.98/6.00/4.21). Abdomen: Ovoid; with four spinnerets. Genitalia: Internal genitalia with two long spermathecae (4–5x longer than wide); spermathecae straight; circular openings almost touching (Fig. 7).

Variation. Male carapace length: 8.9–13.4, x̅ 10.2, n = 34; total length: 25.14–29.26, x̅ 27.20, n = 5; female carapace length: 9.0–14.5, x̅ 11.9, n = 21; total length: 27.50–39.32, x̅ 33.41, n = 5. Female spermathecae vary in length, width and degree of curvature; some specimens have thin and slightly divergent spermathecae whilst others are parallel, some diverge slightly at the base before straightening distally.

Distribution. Based on material examined in the present study, A. robustus was historically found in the northern (Central Coast) and southern Sydney Basin bioregion between Georges River (south) and Tuggerah Lake (north), extending as far west as Baulkham Hills near the southern end of its distribution (Fig. 3). Some records are also known from the Blue Mountains and Wollongong. More recent records from iNaturalist (https://www.inaturalist.org/) and from the AMS collection indicate that the range of A. robustus in the area south of the Parramatta River has been reduced and is limited to the Bankstown–Mortdale area.

Natural History. This species is associated with open and closed sclerophyll forests and woodlands, often near gullies with rainforest elements. It seems quite adaptable and is also found in gardens, parks or industrial areas, as long as the area is partially shaded (Fig. 2C, D), has some degree of permanent moisture, and can provide a refuge from fire and excessive heat. Main [14] and Bradley [52] provide data on seasonal activity, Levitt [53] biological data on specimens in captivity, Duran et al. [12] on defensive behaviour, and Frank et al. [13] a description of mating behaviour in captivity. Note that older publications might also allude to A. montanus, specifically if they refer to specimens from “damp closed forests” [52].

Taxonomic Remarks. The taxonomic history of Atrax robustus is complex and needs some explanation. The original description by O. Pickard-Cambridge [9] is brief and was based on a single, poorly preserved, dried female specimen. Hogg [48] re-described this species based on several female specimens from Queensland and New South Wales in the BMNH collections using colour patterns and eye ratios, with his records from Queensland almost certainly representing misidentified Hadronyche females. Rainbow [10] described males of A. robustus from Turramurra and Mosman (Sydney) as a distinct genus and species, Euctimena tibialis. In his work on venomous Australian spiders, Musgrave [11] examined a large black spider that caused the death of a young child in Thornleigh and matched it not only with Rainbow’s holotype of E. tibialis, but also used somatic morphological characters and collection data to match this male with females of Atrax robustus. The taxonomy was further confused by weak generic concepts meaning that Koch [54] established Hadronyche as a second genus for Australian funnel-web spiders but both Atrax and Hadronyche were diagnosed so poorly that many more species were described in these genera over the years, or shifted between them. Main [14] recognized six species of Atrax and Gray [50] added three additional species before he transferred all species except A. robustus to Hadronyche [17]. Main [15] transferred the Blue Mountains species Poikilomorphia montana Rainbow, 1914 to Atrax (as A. montanus), but this species was later synonymised with A. robustus by Gray [16] and is re-validated here. In his major taxonomic review of funnel-web spiders, Gray [17] not only re-defined and re-diagnosed Atrax and Hadronyche and described Illawarra as a third genus, but also described and diagnosed three species of Atrax, with A. robustus differing from A. sutherlandi by a more elongate embolus and from A. yorkmainorum by a larger body size and a relatively spinose pedipalpal tibia. In his re-description of A. robustus, Gray [17] notes that specimens from the Newcastle region are larger than other individuals and have a longer embolus. These specimens are described here as A. christenseni sp. nov. Overall, Gray [17] had an extensive collection of specimens at his disposal but was taxonomically cautious in the absence of clear-cut morphological features and the continuum of morphological characters. He was never able to examine the holotype of A. robustus (BMNH), which had unclear locality data and we have amended his original description with images of the holotype.

Atrax montanus (Rainbow, 1914), status revised

Figures 2A, 3, 4, 5B and E, 10, 11, 12, 13, 17B, D and F and 18C and D.

Fig. 11
figure 11

Atrax montanus (Rainbow, 1914), dorsal (A, C) and ventral (B, D) female internal genitalia. A. Holotype ♀ (AMS KS.1039). B. ♀ (AMS KS.131640), Stanwell Tops. C, D. ♀ (AMS KS.131642), Springwood. Scale bars: A = 1.0 mm; B–D = 0.5 mm

Fig. 12
figure 12

Atrax montanus (Rainbow, 1914), Symbio, ♂ (AMS KS.131647), dorsal (A) and ventral (B) habitus, eyes (C), labium and endites (D), male leg II (tibia, metatarsus and tarsus), retrolateral view (E). Scale bars: A, B = 5.0 mm; E = 1.0 mm

Fig. 13
figure 13

Atrax montanus (Rainbow, 1914), Symbio, ♂ (AMS KS.131647). A, B. Palp, prolateral (A) and retrolateral (B) views. C–E. Bulb and embolus, prolateral (C), ventral (D) and retrolateral (E) views. Scale bars: A, B = 1.0 mm; C–E = 0.5 mm

Poikilomorphia montana Rainbow [10]: 265, f. 71, 72 (description female).

Atrax montanus: Main [15]: 41.

Atrax robustus: Gray [16]: 114, 115 (in part; P. montana synonymised with A. robustus); Gray [17]: 299, f. 1A, C, 4A–H, 5A–G, 6A–K (in part).

Type material. AUSTRALIA: Holotype ♀ (AMS KS.1039), Blue Mountains, Wentworth Falls [33º43’S 150º22’E], Jamieson Valley [examined]. 

Material Examined. AUSTRALIA: New South Wales: Barr Point [33°31’S 151°10’E], Hawkesbury River, 31 Mar. 1986, Callaghan, 1♂ (AMS KS.16538); Belimba Park [34º04’S 150º33’E], 10 Aug. 2020, K. Christensen, 1♀ (ZMH-A0013058); Bilpin [33º30’S 150º31’E], Sept. 1929, E.M. Huny, 1♀ (AMS KS.1221); Blackheath [33º38’S 150º17’E], 24 Apr. 1948, R. Mckay, 1♀ (AMS KS.1674); Bowral Old South Rd. [ca. 34º29’S 150º26’E], 13 Jun. 1973, M.C. Kinlay, 1♀ (AMS KS.4887); Burraneer Bay [34°04’S 151°08’E], 15 Dec. 1972, 1♂ (AMS KS.4961); Camden [34°03’S 150°42’E], 11 Jun. 1950, V.C. Levitt, 1♀ (AMS KS.5000), 21 Feb. 1974, G. Seymour, 1♂ (AMS KS.1154); Castle Hill [33º39’S 151º03’E], Galston, 26 Mar. 1973, J. Mutton, 1♀ (AMS KS.5128); Clifton Gardens [33º51’S 151º15’E], Sydney, 21 Apr. 1961, Bradley, 1♀ (AMS KS.4030); Colo Vale [34º24’S 150º29’E], 1♀ (AMS KS.5001); Cooranbong [33º04’S 151º27’E], Jul. 1933, E.G. King, 1♀ (AMS KS.1124); Coxs River nr. junction of Breakfast Ck., Blue Mountains, 12 Jan. 1997, 1♀ (AMS KS.49700); Cronulla [34º03’S 151º09’E], 20 Jun. 1971, 1♀ (AMS KS.4988), Aug. 1983, 1♀ (AMS KS.13587); Engadine [34º04’S 151º02’E], 26 Feb. 1973, R. Witchard, 1♂ (AMS KS.4917), 18 Jan. 1990, B. Borham, 1♂ (AMS KS.32391), 10 Aug. 2020, K. Christensen, 1juv. (ZMH-A0013036); Faulconbridge [33°42’S 150°32’E], 28 Jan. 1974, J. Crick, 1♂ (AMS KS.3608); Freemans Reach [ca. 33º36’S 150º49’E], near Windsor, Hawkesbury River, 26 Jan. 1982, M. Gray, 1♀ (AMS KS.8868); Glenning Valley [33º21’S 151º25’E], 23 Dec. 2019, K. Christensen, 1♂ (ZMH-A0013059); Guildford West [33º51’S 150º58’E], 27 Aug. 1957, S.R. Kirkwood, 1♀ (AMS KS.4966); Hartley Vale [33°32’S 150°14’E], 8 Dec. 1952, E.S. Miller, 1♂ (AMS KS.1160); Hazelbrook [33°44’S 150°27’E], 6 Feb. 1977, T.F. Stanford, 1♂ (AMS KS.1145); Heathcote [34º05’S 151º00’E], 14 Oct. 1973, R. Witchard, 1♀ (AMS KS.5122); Helensburgh [34º12’S 150º59’E], 2020, J. Prangell, 1juv. (ZMH-A0013055); Kingswood [33º46’S 150º43’E], May 1962, 1♀ (AMS KS.4993); Kurrajong [33º33’S 150º40’E], 30 May 1980, M.J. Fletcher, 1♀ (AMS KS.5307); Lakemba [33º56’S 151º05’E], 17 Mar. 1931, P. Bindon, 1♀ (AMS KS.4945); Lane Cove National Park, 33º46’S 151º06’E, 10 Jan. 2020, B. Jones, 1juv. (ZMH-A0012978); Lane Cove National Park [33º47’S 151º09’E], 20 Feb. 2020, B. Buzatto, 1♂ (ZMH-A0012984); Lawson [33°43’S 150°26’E], Mar. 1956, R. Schleicher, 1♂ (AMS KS.1146); Lilli Pilli [34°04’S 151°07’E], Sydney, 16 Jul. 1985, C. Rodwell, 1♂ (AMS KS.17543); Lindfield [33º47’S 151º10’E], 29 Sept. 1962, M. Gregg & V. Gregg, 1♀ (AMS KS.5028); Menai [34º01’S 151º01’E], 10 Aug. 2020, K. Christensen, 1♀ (AMS KS.131641); Mount Wilson [33º31’S 150º22’E], May 1973, P. Kinloch, 1♀ (AMS KS.3605); Mulgoa (Penrith) [33º51’S 150º39’E], Sept. 1993, B. Bone, 1♀ (AMS KS.40766); Penshurst [33º58’S 151º06’E], 1♀ (AMS KS.53217); Pittwater, Jan. 1967, R. Mascord, 1♀ (AMS KS.43798); Potts Point [33°52’S 151°13’E], 5 Jul. 1956, P. Berry Smith, 1♂ (AMS KS.4399); Springwood [33º42’S 150º34’E], 20 Jan. 1956, E. Falcon, 1♀ (AMS KS.1673), 14 Jul. 1971, 1♀ (AMS KS.1217), 1♂ (AMS KS.1138), 3 Oct. 2018, K. Christensen, 1♀ (AMS KS.131642); Stanwell Park [34º14’S 150º59’E], 10 Sept. 1960, R. Newell, 1♀ (AMS KS.5009); Stanwell Tops 2 [Stanwell Tops, 34º13’S 151º00’E], 10 Aug. 2020, K. Christensen, 1♀ (AMS KS.131640); Sutherland [34°02’S 151°03’E], 2 May 1986, M. Mcinnes, 1♂ (AMS KS.16562); Southerland [Sutherland, 34º02’S 151º03’E], 2020, J. Prangell, 1juv. (ZMH-A0013056); Symbio (Helensburgh) [Symbio Wildlife Park, 34º12’S 150º58’E], 7 Aug. 2019, K. Christensen, 1♀ (ZMH-A0012999), 28 Aug. 2019, K. Christensen, 2♀ (ZMH-A0013006, ZMH-A0013032), 29 Oct. 2019, K. Christensen, 1♂ (AMS KS.131647); between Terrigal and Avoca [ca. 33º27’S 151º25’E], 16 Mar. 1981, Kennedy, 1♀ (AMS KS.7235); Warragamba [33º53’S 150º36’E], 17 Jan. 2020, K. Christensen, 1♂ (AMS KS.131643); Windsor [33º37’S 150º49’E], 21 Jan. 2020, K. Christensen, 1♂ (ZMH-A0013005), 23 Apr. 2020, K. Christensen, 1♂ (ZMH-A0013034); Wirrimbirra Sanctuary [34º16’S 150º35’E], nr. Bargo, 9 Jul. 1969, M.N. Fackendet, 1♀ (AMS KS.1848); Woronora Heights [34°02’S 151°02’E], 23 Dec. 1992, 1♂ (AMS KS.37155); Wyong [33º17’S 151º25’E], 19 Jan. 1920, M.E. Piper, 1♀ (AMS KS.16511); Yerranderie [34º07’S 150º13’E], 1978, V. Lhuede, 1♀ (AMS KS.1851).

Diagnosis. Adult males are distinguished from all species by the following combination of characters: carapace length x̅ 10.2 (9.0–11.5); palpal tibia 3.3x longer than wide (Fig. 13); embolus 8x longer than wide and with sinuous curvature (Figs. 5B and 17B, D and F). Males can be further distinguished from A. robustus by their embolus tip with narrow opening (Fig. 17B, D, F) vs. wider in the latter (Fig. 17A, C, E); from A. sutherlandi by their long (8x longer than wide), smoothly curving embolus, while shorter and strongly curved embolus in the latter (see Gray [17]: fig. 12G) and from A. yorkmainorum by the slightly twisted embolus with the tip strongly twisted in the latter (see Gray [17]: fig. 10A). Females are distinguished from all species by the combination of the following characters: carapace length x̅ 11.5, (9.1–14.5) and spermathecae (5–6x longer than wide) curved inward; from A. robustus which have shorter, straighter spermathecae (4–5x longer than wide), and A. sutherlandi which have the spermathecae base wide and touching (3x longer than wide) (see Gray [17]: fig. 13F), while spermathecae base narrow and separated in Atrax montanus (Fig. 11).

Description. Male (AMS KS.131647). Total length: 21.87; carapace length: 11.18; carapace width: 9.28; abdomen length: 10.69 (Fig. 12). Colouration (in ethanol): Carapace, endites and sternum dark brown; chelicerae dark brown; abdomen dark grey; legs reddish-brown. Carapace: Broadly oval, pars cephalica slightly elevated; fovea transverse, slightly procurved. Endites: With ~ 250 cuspules. Labium: With ~ 480 cuspules. Eyes: Eye formula 4:4; ocular quadrangle rectangular; AME separated by 1.2x their own diameter; PME separated by 2.8x own diameter. Sternum: Longer than wide; three pairs of ovoid sigilla, posterior pair the largest. Chelicerae: Rastellum absent; promargin with 14 teeth, retromargin with 16 teeth, furrow with 14 denticles. Leg measurements: I 32.56 (8.94/4.54/7.43/8.06/4.49); II 31.31 (8.96/3.66/6.99/7.19/4.51); III 26.86 (7.44/3.01/5.91/6.00/4.50); IV 32.53 (7.69/3.33/7.98/8.08/5.45); leg formula 1423. Abdomen: Ovoid; with four spinnerets. Genitalia: Palpal tibia 5.57/1.69; bulb 5.17/1.02. Palpal tibia with four macrosetae prolateral; 3.3x longer than wide; embolus 8x longer than wide; sinuous curvature; embolus tip with large, arrow-shaped flap (Figs. 13, 17B, D and F and 18C and D).

Female Holotype (AMS KS.1039). Total length: 25.4; carapace length: 11.1; carapace width: 9.4; abdomen length: 12.5 (Fig. 10). Colouration (in ethanol): Carapace and legs amber-brown; chelicerae reddish-brown, darker distally; abdomen fawn-brown, slightly mottled; sternum amber-orange with darker margins and orange sigilla; labium and endites orange with black cuspules. Carapace: Broadly oval; pars cephalica slightly elevated; fovea transverse, slightly procurved. Endites: With ~ 324 cuspules. Labium: With ~ 276 cuspules. Sternum: Longer than wide; three pairs of ovoid sigilla; posterior pair of sigilla largest, anterior pairs much smaller, subequal. Chelicerae: Rastellum absent; promargin with 12 (left) or 14 teeth, retromargin with 13 teeth, furrow with c. 30–35 denticles. Eyes: Eye formula 4:4; ocular quadrangle rectangular; AME separated by 1.5x their own diameter; PME separated by 2.0x their own diameter. Leg measurements: I 27.7 (8.3/5.0/5.9/5.5/3.0); II 24.8 (7.4/4.3/5.1/4.9/3.1); III 23.1 (6.4/4.0/4.3/4.8/3.6); IV 28.5 (7.5/4.3/5.9/6.6/4.2); leg formula 4123. Abdomen: Ovoid; with four spinnerets. Genitalia: Internal genitalia with two long spermathecae (5–6x longer than wide), slightly curved inward; oval opening almost touching (Fig. 11).

Female (AMS KS.131640). Total length: 23.45; carapace length: 10.41; carapace width: 8.68; abdomen length: 13.04 (Fig. 10). Colouration (in ethanol): Carapace and legs reddish-brown; chelicerae dark reddish-brown; abdomen dark grey; sternum orange with darker margins and sigilla; labium and endites dark orange with black cuspules. Carapace: Broadly oval; pars cephalica slightly elevated; fovea transverse, slightly procurved. Endites: With ~ 305 cuspules. Labium: With ~ 344 cuspules. Sternum: Longer than wide; three pairs of ovoid sigilla; posterior pair of sigilla largest, anterior pair smallest. Chelicerae: Rastellum absent; promargin with 13 teeth, retromargin with 9 teeth, furrow with 24 denticles. Eyes: Eye formula 4:4; ocular quadrangle rectangular; AME separated by 1.5x their own diameter; PME separated by 2.5x their own diameter. Leg measurements: I 23.97 (6.75/4.03/5.60/4.48/3.11); II 21.84 (6.49/3.29/4.63/4.34/3.09); III 19.27 (4.73/3.46/3.82/4.14/3.12); IV 25.26 (7.23/3.67/5.77/5.47/3.12); leg formula 4123. Abdomen: Ovoid; with four spinnerets. Genitalia: Internal genitalia with two long spermathecae (5–6x longer than wide), slightly curved inward; oval opening almost touching (Fig. 11).

Variation. Male carapace length: 9.0–11.5, x̅ 10.2, n = 19; total length: 19.34–25.12, x̅ 22.68, n = 5; female carapace length: 9.1–14.5, x̅ 11.5, n = 25; total length: 20.99–23.45, x̅ 22.27, n = 5. Specimens with male palpal tibia similar to A. robustus were noted. Female spermathecae vary in length, width and degree of curvature; some specimens are gently curving, others sharply elbowed; most are strongly convergent distally.

Distribution. Found in the southern and northern Sydney Basin bioregion, extending at least as far south as Bowral in the Southern Highlands, and into the upper Blue Mountains to the west (Fig. 3). This species overlaps with A. robustus in distribution, however, its range is mainly to the south and west of Sydney.

Natural History. Field data suggest that this species is associated with rainforest gullies and requires more shading and moisture than A. robustus (Fig. 2A). It builds funnel-webs under rocks or tree logs, often near or in rainforest gullies.

Taxonomic Remarks. This species was originally described by Rainbow [10] in the monotypic genus Poikilomorphia Rainbow, 1914. It was moved to Atrax by Main [15] as Atrax montanus, but later synonymised with A. robustus by Gray ([16]: p. 114, 115). The spermathecae of the female holotype (AMS KS.1039) from the Blue Mountains is identical to spermathecae of females from Stanwell Tops (AMS KS.131640) and Springwood (ZMH-A0013007) that were sequenced (Fig. 11), but can be easily distinguished from the spermathecae of A. robustus based on the characters described above. Considering all available evidence, A. montanus is re-validated here.

Atrax christenseni Dupérré & Smith sp. nov.

Zoobank: urn: lsid: zoobank.org: pub:54DF0756-7CE4-49A1-B43A-ED1E6C3037AF.

Figures 2B, 3, 4, 5C and F, 14, 15, 16, 17G and H and 18E and F.

Fig. 14
figure 14

Atrax christenseni sp. nov., allotype ♀ (AMS KS.131645). A, B. Dorsal (A) and ventral (B) habitus. C, D. Dorsal (C) and ventral (D) internal genitalia. Scale bars: A, B = 5.0 mm; C, D = 0.5 mm

Fig. 15
figure 15

Atrax christenseni sp. nov., holotype ♂ (AMS KS.131644), dorsal (A) and ventral (B) habitus, eyes (C), labium and endites (D), male leg II (tibia, metatarsus and tarsus), retrolateral view (E). Scale bars: A, B = 5.0 mm; E = 1.0 mm

Fig. 16
figure 16

Atrax christenseni sp. nov., holotype ♂ (AMS KS.131644). A, B. Palp, prolateral (A) and retrolateral (B) views. C–E. Bulb and embolus, prolateral (C), ventral (D) and retrolateral (E) views. Scale bars: A, B = 1.0 mm; C–E = 0.5 mm

Fig. 17
figure 17

SEM, embolus tip, prolateral (A, B, G) and prolatero-ventral (C, D, E, F, H) views. A, C, E. Atrax robustus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1877. B, D, F. Atrax montanus (Rainbow, 1914). G, H. Atrax christenseni sp. nov.

Fig. 18
figure 18

SEM, embolus tip, ventral view. A, B. Atrax robustus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1877. C, D. Atrax montanus (Rainbow, 1914). E, F. Atrax christenseni sp. nov.

Atrax robustus: Gray [17]: 299, 301 (in part).

Type Material. AUSTRALIA: New South Wales: all Newcastle area: Holotype ♂ (AMS KS.131644), 13 Feb. 2020, K. Christensen. Allotype ♀ (AMS KS.131645), 8 Jun. 2020, K. Christensen. Paratypes: 1♂ (ZMH-A0012979), 5 Mar. 2009, K. Christensen; 1♂ (ZMH-A0012991), 24 Jan. 2020, K. Christensen; 1♂ (ZMH-A0013020), 6 Feb. 2020, K. Christensen; 1♂ (ZMH-A0013013), 13 Feb. 2020, K. Christensen; 1♂ (AMS KS.131046), 13 Mar. 2020, K. Christensen; 1♂ (ZMH-A0012998), undated, K. Christensen; 2♀ (ZMH-A00024111, AMS KS.131646), 28 Jun. 2022, D. Harms & B.A. Buzatto.

Material Examined. AUSTRALIA: New South Wales: all Newcastle area: 1♀ (AMS KS.1123), undated, A. Munro; Nov. 1965, J. Splatt, 1♂ (AMS KS.1122); 6 Dec. 1978, R. Mascord, 1♀ (AMS KS.7564); 1979, L. Hallinan, 1♂ (AMS KS.2670); 20 Jan. 1979, R.E. Mascord, 1♀ (AMS KS.4774); 21 Jan. 1979, R.E. Mascord, 1♂ (AMS KS.4773); 22 Jan. 1979, H. Miller, 1♂ (AMS KS.2432); 1 Feb. 1980, G.J. Anderson, 1♂ (AMS KS.4484); 17 Jan. 1982, R. Mascord, 1♂ (AMS KS.10381), 1♀ (AMS KS.10382); 26 Dec. 2004, G. Holl, 1♂ (AMS KS.120552); 3 Feb. 2001, via G. Isbister, 1♂ (AMS KS.120567); 2003, H. Bartlett, 1♂ (AMS KS.88192); 29 Jan. 2020, K. Christensen, 1♂ (AMS KS.131037).

Etymology. The specific epithet was chosen in honour of Kane Christensen, whose contributions in collecting spiders were vital to the description of this species.

Diagnosis. Adult males are distinguished from all species by their extremely long embolus (12x longer than wide) and widely open embolus tip (Figs. 5C and 17G and H), while shorter in A. robustus (6.5x longer than wide), A. montanus (8x longer than wide) and A. sutherlandi (3.8x longer than wide) (see Gray [17]: fig. 12G); and from A. yorkmainorum by the slightly twisted embolus tip (Figs. 5C and 17G and H) that is strongly twisted in the latter (see Gray [17]: fig. 10A). Females differ from all species by their elongate spermathecae (9x longer than wide) that are strongly curved internally and with a large oval entrance almost touching (Fig. 14); A. robustus spermathecae 4–5x longer than wide, A. montanus 5–6x longer than wide, and A. sutherlandi 3x longer than wide (see Gray [17]: fig. 13F).

Description. Male Holotype (AMS KS.131644). Total length: 20.88; carapace length: 10.47; carapace width: 8.32; abdomen length: 10.41 (Fig. 15). Colouration (in ethanol): Carapace and legs reddish-brown; chelicerae dark reddish-brown; abdomen dark grey; sternum dark reddish-orange with slightly darker margins and sigilla; labium and endites reddish-orange with black cuspules. Carapace: Rectangular, pars cephalica slightly elevated; fovea transverse, slightly procurved. Endites: With ~ 245 cuspules. Labium: With ~ 404 cuspules. Sternum: Longer than wide; three pairs of ovoid sigilla; posterior pair of sigilla largest, anterior pair smallest. Chelicerae: Rastellum absent; promargin with 11 teeth, retromargin with 11 teeth, furrow with 14 denticles. Eyes: Eye formula 4:4; ocular quadrangle rectangular; ALE separated by 0.7x their own diameter; PME separated by 4x own diameter. Leg measurements: I 33.15 (9.82/4.10/7.41/7.33/4.49); II 29.77 (8.86/4.03/6.38/6.60/3.90); III 27.22 (7.20/2.92/5.51/6.33/5.26); IV 32.68 (9.03/3.69/6.95/7.72/5.29); leg formula 1423. Abdomen: Ovoid; with four spinnerets. Genitalia: Palpal tibia 6.88/1.86; bulb 8.51/1.39. Palpal tibia with four macrosetae prolaterally; 3.7x longer than wide; embolus 12x longer than wide; smooth curvature, embolus tip with small flap and pointed tip (Figs. 16, 17G and H and 18E and F).

Female Allotype (AMS KS.131645). Total length: 29.29; carapace length: 12.62; carapace width: 10.37; abdomen length: 17.17 (Fig. 14). Colouration (in ethanol): Carapace and legs reddish-brown; chelicerae dark reddish-brown; abdomen light brown; sternum orange with slightly darker margins and sigilla; labium and endites orange-brown with black cuspules. Carapace: Rectangular, pars cephalica slightly elevated; fovea transverse, slightly procurved. Endites: With ~ 225 cuspules. Labium: With ~ 420 cuspules. Sternum: Longer than wide; three pairs of ovoid sigilla; posterior pair of sigilla largest, anterior pair smallest. Chelicerae: Rastellum absent; promargin with 14 teeth, retromargin with 13 teeth, furrow with 16 denticles. Eyes: Eye formula 4:4; ocular quadrangle rectangular; AME separated by 1.4x their own diameter; PME separated by 3.2x their own diameter. Leg measurements: I 31.57 (9.92/4.56/7.33/6.32/3.44); II 26.91 (8.31/4.21/5.71/5.51/3.17); III 23.99 (7.25/3.13/5.08/5.24/3.58); IV 28.17 (8.18/3.80/5.94/6.16/4.09); leg formula 1423. Abdomen: Ovoid; with four spinnerets. Genitalia: Internal genitalia with two long spermathecae (9x longer than wide), slightly curved inward; large oval opening almost touching (Fig. 14).

Variation. Male carapace length: 9.7–13.0, x̅ 11.3, n = 15; total length: 20.53–24.03, x̅ 21.72, n = 4; female carapace length: 11.6–13.5, x̅ 12.4, n = 6.

Distribution. This species is distributed north of Sydney with all records situated in a 25 km radius around Newcastle (Fig. 3). Exact locations are hidden to protect this species, which occurs across a restricted area and may be endangered by collecting.

Natural History. This species seems to build very cryptic funnel-webs (in contrast to A. robustus) and this might explain the difficulties in collecting this species over the years (Fig. 2B). Detailed habitat data for recently collected specimens is concealed in the present work to protect this species from overharvesting, but is available for research purposes on the AMS and ZMH collections’ databases. Little else is known but this species is much less common than A. robustus. It seems to have a narrow range and is presently endemic to the Newcastle region.

Taxonomic Remarks. In his revision, Gray ([17]: p. 301) noted that specimens of A. robustus from the Hunter River/Newcastle region were generally larger, and that the pedipalpal tibia and embolus of males was somewhat more elongate. In subsequent years, venom was extracted from several unusually large males collected near Newcastle and the press referred to these males as the “Newcastle big boys”. Based on our molecular phylogeny and the diagnostic characters described above, these specimens near Newcastle represent A. christenseni.

Discussion

Systematics of Atrax in central eastern New South Wales

Our study provides evidence that one of the world’s most iconic spiders is in fact a species complex. The Sydney funnel-web spider sensu Gray, 2010 is divided here into three species that are differentiated both morphologically and phylogenetically, and seem to occupy distinct ranges (with some overlap): A. robustus sensu stricto is largely distributed in the wider Sydney metropolitan area and Central Coast with some records from the Blue Mountains and Wollongong; A. christenseni sp. nov. is found in the area around Newcastle to the north; and A. montanus overlaps with A. robustus in the Sydney metropolitan region but extends further west into the upper Blue Mountains, as far south as the Southern Highlands and further north on the Central Coast. Despite the imprecise type locality (New Holland) of A. robustus, we confirm that the holotype is morphologically indistinguishable from females now found in the northern suburbs (e.g., Lane Cove National Park) and previously also in south-eastern suburbs – settled soon after the establishment of the British colony – and hence we consider the populations centred around the North Shore of Sydney to represent the real A. robustus. Following our revised taxonomy, we recognize five species of Atrax: A. robustus and A. montanus (northern and southern Sydney Basin bioregion, including the Blue Mountains), A. christenseni (northern Sydney Basin bioregion in the area around Newcastle), A. yorkmainorum (Australian Alps) and A. sutherlandi (South Eastern Highlands and coastal regions of south-eastern New South Wales and northeastern Victoria).

Species identification in mygalomorph spiders is a complex endeavour and the general lineage species concept might be applied in such cases to collate different lines of evidence (e.g., phylogenetic, morphological, ecological) to inform taxonomic decisions [55]. The three Atrax species examined here share the common attributes of mygalomorph spiders such as population structuring, albeit lower levels likely due to more recent divergence dates: e.g., 1.3–5.8% COI intraspecific divergence for A. christenseni, A. robustus and A. montanus, compared to 22% in the mouse spider species Missulena davidi Greenberg et al., 2021 [56]. They also differ morphologically in body size, carapace and ratios of the female (spermathecae) and male (bulb and embolus) genitalia. These differences are consistent, despite some variation noted in species accounts. We also note habitat differences for these species that was observed during our own field work: A. robustus is found in open and closed woodlands; A. montanus seems to mostly occur in rainforest habitats and is often associated with gullies and drainage lines; and A christenseni’s ecology remains poorly understood. Our understanding of Atrax ecology and behaviour is still in its infancy [12, 13, 52] and more studies are needed. However, these ecological differences lend further support to our species hypothesis under the general lineage species concept.

It is beyond the scope of this study to taxonomically revise the genus Atrax and we stress that the number of funnel-web species might rise in the future. A. yorkmainorum and A. sutherlandi are currently considered widespread [17], however, detailed studies using wide spatial coverage in combination with molecular phylogenetics might lead to revised species concepts, similar to A. robustus. Although A. yorkmainorum was excluded from our molecular phylogenetic analysis, it is clearly morphologically distinct from the other Atrax species. A. sutherlandi females (ZMH-A0016609 and ZMH-A0024181) from Bermagui (the type locality) also possess unique spermathecae, and previous research has shown that this species is genetically structured [19]. We observed a deep divergence between the two A. sutherlandi specimens included in our phylogenetic analysis, and incorporating additional samples from across the distribution of A. sutherlandi, in combination with detailed morphological work, may also reveal that A. sutherlandi is a species complex.

Biogeography and conservation of Atrax in central eastern New South Wales

The genus Atrax is too young to be classified as an ancient Gondwana relict and potentially split from Hadronyche in the Late Cretaceous [22], as supported by our divergence time estimation analysis (72 Ma). Atrax likely began to diversify in the Oligocene (30 Ma), with population divergences occurring as late as Plio-Pleistocene. Vicariant speciation caused by habitat fragmentation induced by Miocene aridification likely contributed to Atrax diversification – a common pattern observed in the mesic Australian fauna including mygalomorph spiders [57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64] and other taxa (e.g., [65,66,67,68,69]). However, it is unclear what role other barriers in the Sydney Basin and beyond (e.g., topography of the Blue Mountains, major rivers) played in Atrax biogeography, and future research should focus on the species boundaries and identifying factors promoting diversification. What is potentially more interesting is the geographic structuring observed among populations. Atrax robustus is comparatively an agile spider with plastic habitat associations. It is often found in disturbed habitats such as gardens and parks (e.g., [1, 70]), and genetic data support the idea of a more continuous distribution in the absence of major population divergences (2.6% COI divergences across all samples). These low divergences could result from relatively recent habitat fragmentation (since the Pliocene), or also indicate a relatively high plasticity in habitat association and dispersal capacity.

Our study also provides a conservation message, even if Atrax robustus and its congeners might be seen as pests by many living within the range of these species. Almost all records from metropolitan Sydney (specifically in the area south of Sydney Harbour/Parramatta River and north of Botany Bay/Georges River) in our distribution map (Fig. 3) are pre-2000, yet there are no AMS records of Atrax from this area since then. With the rise in digital photography and online identification services, few specimens enter museum collections today, so we cannot comment from AMS records alone. However, iNaturalist has become a useful tool for examining trends in such relatively large and easy to document species. Although A. robustus is not listed as threatened or protected by IUCN [71] or CITES [72], our field studies in combination with iNaturalist records and the historical AMS collections suggest a genuine population decline in the more heavily developed Sydney suburbs. In the 1950s, ‘funnel-webs’ were noted to be common in the area of Potts Point, just east of the city centre (AMS KS.4399, A. montanus, label data), yet there has been no Australian Museum record from there, or indeed any of the south-eastern suburbs since the 1970s, and there are no reliable recent records in iNaturalist either. Thus A. robustus and A. montanus may have been almost completely extirpated from this heavily populated area, despite the continuing presence of well vegetated reserves in some steeper gullies. The situation is little better further west, with records since 2000 being only from the Bankstown area. Immediately north of Sydney Harbour, the source of many AMS records of (mostly) A. robustus, there are still occasional records on iNaturalist but now fewer than in the more bush-rich areas of the Upper North Shore. Our team’s recent attempts to collect in this area were unsuccessful.

Atrax christenseni sp. nov. has a very restricted distribution and is found in remnant bush patches in a small radius surrounding Newcastle and genetic diversity is low. This species might be threatened by urbanization and habitat loss, and possibly even the pet trade, but more research is needed. The same holds true for A. montanus, which although widespread, comprises genetically distinct populations that have unique evolutionary potential. The preservation of localized populations in all three species should be prioritized.

Implications for Venom Research and antivenom production

The present study emphasizes the importance of systematics in an applied framework. Antivenom for Atrax robustus was developed in 1981 [73], and since then no fatalities have occurred. Antivenom production relies on wild-caught male specimens, which are dropped off at hospitals by members of the public, and then milked for venom at the Australian Reptile Park. Although this has proven to be an effective approach, some of the variation previously observed in A. robustus venom can certainly be attributed to taxonomic confusion, as specimens labeled as A. robustus in some venom studies are probably either A. montanus or A. christenseni. Considering their unique evolutionary histories, it is conceivable that the venom profiles of A. robustus, A. montanus and A. christenseni would differ, and characterizing venom in each of these species may also reveal differences in the presence, quantity and/or structure of delta-atracotoxin – the polypeptide that slows inactivation of sodium-ion channels in primates [74]. In short, the rich body of literature on A. robustus venom needs to be re-examined in light of our revised taxonomic framework.

Conclusions

Antivenom and biomedical research on medically important species ultimately relies on sound taxonomic concepts for the species in question. Here we show that the iconic Sydney funnel-web spider Atrax robustus sensu Gray, 2010 is a complex of three species (A. robustus sensu stricto, A. montanus and A. christenseni) that differ phylogenetically and morphologically. Targeted venom analyses of these species might follow, but the findings of past biochemical studies should be re-evaluated in light of a modern taxonomic framework. Antivenom seems to be effective for all Atrax species but antivenom specificity to the “real” Sydney funnel-web spider might benefit from acknowledging interspecific boundaries, intraspecific genetic variation, and from considering the distributional range of this species and its congeners. Conservation measures may be warranted to preserve genetic diversity in Atrax spp. lineages.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the Genbank repository (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank; see Table S1 for accession codes).

References

  1. Sutherland SK. The Sydney Funnel-web spider (Atrax robustus): 3. A review of some clinical records of human envenomation. Med J Aust. 1972;2(12):643–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1972.tb103441.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher MM, Carr GA, McGuinness R, Warden JC. Atrax robustus envenomation. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1980;8(4):410–20. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1177/0310057X8000800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hartman LJ, Sutherland SK. Funnel-web spider (Atrax robustus) antivenom in the treatment of human envenomation. Med J Aust. 1984;141(12–13):796–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1984.tb132953.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Scott G. The funnelweb. Toowoomba: Darling Downs Institute Press; 1980. p. 67.

  5. Nicholson GM, Little MJ, Tyler M, Narahashi T. Selective alteration of sodium channel gating by Australian funnel-web spider toxins. Toxicon. 1996;34(11–12):1443–53. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/S0041-0101(96)00089-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alewood D, Birinyi-Strachan LC, Pallaghy PK, Norton RS, Nicholson GM, Alewood PF. Synthesis and characterization of δ-Atracotoxin-Ar1a, the lethal neurotoxin from venom of the Sydney funnel-web spider (Atrax robustus). Biochemistry. 2003;42(44):12933–40. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1021/bi030091n.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson D. The venom of Australian spiders. In: Gopalakrishnakone P, Corzo G, de Lima ME, E D-G, editors. Spider Venoms. Netherlands: Springer; 2016:21–46.

  8. Herzig V, Sunagar K, Wilson DT, Pineda SS, Israel MR, Dutertre S, McFarland BS, Undheim EA, Hodgson WC, Alewood PF, Lewis RJ. Australian funnel-web spiders evolved human-lethal δ-hexatoxins for defense against vertebrate predators. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117(40):24920–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1073/pnas.2004516117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Pickard-Cambridge O. On some new genera and species of Araneidea. Ann Mag Nat Hist. 1877;19(109):26–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rainbow WJ. Studies in Australian Araneidae–6. The Terretelariae. Rec Aust Mus. 1914;10(8):187–270. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3853/j.0067-1975.10.1914.901.

  11. Musgrave A. Some poisonous Australian spiders. Records Australian Museum. 1927;16:33–46. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3853/j.0067-1975.16.1927.777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Duran LH, Wilson DT, Rymer TL. Behaviour of the Sydney funnel-web spider Atrax robustus over different contexts, time, and stimuli. Toxicon: X. 2022;13:100093. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.toxcx.2022.100093.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Frank S-C, Christensen K, Lourenço R, Harms D, Buzatto BA. Mating behavior of the Sydney funnel-web spider (Atracidae: Atrax robustus) and implications for the evolution of courtship in mygalomorph spiders. J Zool. 2023;320(3):169–78. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/jzo.13070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Main BY. Spiders of Australia. Brisbane: Jacaranda; 1964. p. 1–125.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Main BY. Arachnida. Mygalomorphae In: Zoological Catalogue Australia. 1985;3:1–183.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gray MR. Aspects of the systematics of the Australian funnel-web spiders (Araneae: Hexathelidae: Atracinae) based upon morphological and electrophoretic data. Australian Entomol Soc Miscellaneous Publication. 1988;5:113–25.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gray MR. A revision of the Australian funnel-web spiders (Hexathelidae: Atracinae). Records Australian Museum. 2010;62(3):285–392. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3853/j.0067-1975.16.1927.777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. World Spider Catalog. Version 25.0. Naturhistoriches Museum Bern. 2024. https://wsc.nmbe.ch/. Accessed 21 Feb 2024.

  19. Beavis AS, Sunnucks P, Rowell DM. Microhabitat preferences drive phylogeographic disparities in two Australian funnel web spiders. Biol J Linn Soc. 2011;104(4):805–19. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01753.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wheeler WC, et al. The spider tree of life: phylogeny of Araneae based on target-gene analyses from an extensive taxon sampling. Cladistics. 2017;33(6):574–616. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/cla.12182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hedin M, Derkarabetian S, Alfaro A, Ramírez MJ, Bond JE. Phylogenomic analysis and revised classification of atypoid mygalomorph spiders (Araneae, Mygalomorphae), with notes on arachnid ultraconserved element loci. PeerJ. 2019;7:e6864. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.7717/peerj.6864.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Opatova V, Hamilton CA, Hedin M, De Oca LM, Král J, Bond JE. Phylogenetic systematics and evolution of the spider infraorder mygalomorphae using genomic scale data. Syst Biol. 2020;69(4):671–707. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/sysbio/syz064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Danielson JJ, Gesch DB. Global multi-resolution terrain elevation data 2010 (GMTED2010) (USGS Numbered Series No. 2011–1073), Open-File Report. U.S. Geological Survey; 2011. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3133/ofr20111073.

  24. Crossman S, Li O. Surface hydrology polygons (National). Geoscience Australia, Canberra. 2015. https://pid.geoscience.gov.au/dataset/ga/83135.

  25. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biology Biotechnol. 1994;3(5):294–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Prendini L, Crowe TM, Wheeler WC. Systematics and biogeography of the family Scorpionidae (Chelicerata: Scorpiones), with a discussion on phylogenetic methods. Invertebrate Syst. 2003;17(2):185–259. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1071/IS02016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Simon C, Franke A, Martin A. The polymerase chain reaction: DNA extraction and amplification. In: Hewitt GM, Johnston AWB, Young JPW, editors. Molecular techniques in Taxonomy. NATO ASI Series. Volume 57. New York: Springer; 1991. pp. 329–55. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-3-642-83962-7_22.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Nunn GB, Theisen BF, Christensen B, Arctander P. Simplicity-correlated size growth of the nuclear 28S ribosomal RNA D3 expansion segment in the crustacean order Isopoda. J Mol Evol. 1996;42:211–23. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/BF02198847.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Harms D, Harvey MS, Roberts JD, Loria SF. Tectonically driven climate change and the spread of temperate biomes: insights from dragon pseudoscorpions (Pseudotyrannochthoniidae), a globally distributed arachnid lineage. J Biogeogr. 2024;51(6):1032–48. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/jbi.14801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma KI, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(14):3059–66. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/nar/gkf436.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(4):772–80. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/molbev/mst010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Miller MA, Schwartz T, Pickett BE, He S, Klem EB, Scheuermann RH, Passarotti M, Kaufman S, O’Leary MA. A RESTful API for access to phylogenetic tools via the CIPRES science gateway. Evolutionary Bioinf. 2015;11:EBO-S21501. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.4137/EBO.S21501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 3.5. 2019. http://mesquiteproject.org

  34. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(7):3022–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/molbev/msab120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(21):2688–90. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1312–3. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3: bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(12):1572–4. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 2010;59(3):307–21. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/sysbio/syq010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 2012;9(8):772. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/nmeth.2109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29(8):1969–73. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/molbev/mss075.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Suchard MA, Lemey P, Baele G, Ayres DL, Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetic and phylodynamic data integration using BEAST 1.10. Virus Evol. 2018;4(1):vey016. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/ve/vey016.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Brower AV. Rapid morphological radiation and convergence among races of the butterfly Heliconius erato inferred from patterns of mitochondrial DNA evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1994;91(14):6491–5. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1073/pnas.91.14.649.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Papadopoulou A, Anastasiou I, Vogler AP. Revisiting the insect mitochondrial molecular clock: the mid-aegean trench calibration. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27(7):1659–72. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/molbev/msq051.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bidegaray-Batista L, Ferrández MÁ, Arnedo MA. Winter is coming: Miocene and Quaternary climatic shifts shaped the diversification of western‐Mediterranean Harpactocrates (Araneae, Dysderidae) spiders. Cladistics. 2014;30(4):428–46. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/cla.12054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Abel C, Schneider JM, Kuntner M, Harms D. Phylogeography of the ‘cosmopolitan’ orb-weaver Argiope trifasciata (Araneae: Araneidae). Biol J Linn Soc. 2020;131(1):61–75. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/biolinnean/blaa078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Monjaraz-Ruedas R, Mendez RW, Hedin M. Species delimitation, biogeography, and natural history of dwarf funnel web spiders (Mygalomorphae, Hexurellidae, Hexurella) from the United States/Mexico borderlands. ZooKeys. 2023;1167:109. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3897/zookeys.1167.103463.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA. Posterior summarisation in bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst Biol. 2018;67:901–4. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/sysbio/syy032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Hogg HR. On Australian and New Zealand spiders of the suborder Mygalomorphæ 1. In: Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1901. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 1980 71(1):218–284.

  49. Nishikawa Y. Notes on the venomous spiders (funnel-web spider and red-back spider) in Australia. Otemon Bull Austral Stud. 1976;2:176–93.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gray MR. The taxonomy of Atrax adelaidensis species group (Macrothelinae: Mygalomorphae) with notes on burrowing behaviour. Records South Australian Museum. 1984;18:441–52.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Gray MR. Distribution of the funnel-web spiders. In: Covacevich J, Davie P, editors. Toxic plants and animals: a guide for Australia. Brisbane: Queensland Museum; 1987. p. 312–21.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Bradley RA. Seasonal activity patterns in Sydney funnel-web spiders, Atrax spp. (Araneae: Hexathelidae). Bull Br Arachnol Soc. 1993;9(6):189–97.

  53. Levitt V. The funnel web spider in captivity. Proc Royal Zoological Soc (NSW). 1961;1958:80–4.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Koch L. Die Arachniden Australiens. Nürnberg. 1873;1:369–472.

    Google Scholar 

  55. De Queiroz K. The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation. In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH, editors. Endless forms: species and speciation 1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998. pp. 57–75.

  56. Greenberg MR, Huey JA, Framenau VW, Harms D. Three new species of mouse spider (Araneae: Actinopodidae: Missulena Walckenaer, 1805) from Western Australia, including an assessment of intraspecific variability in a widespread species from the arid biome. Arthropod Syst Phylogeny. 2021;79:509–33. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3897/asp.79.e62332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Rix MG, Cooper SJ, Meusemann K, Klopfstein S, Harrison SE, Harvey MS, Austin AD. Post-eocene climate change across continental Australia and the diversification of Australasian spiny trapdoor spiders (Idiopidae: Arbanitinae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2017;109:302–20. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ympev.2017.01.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Harvey MS, Hillyer MJ, Main BY, Moulds TA, Raven RJ, Rix MG, Vink CJ, Huey JA. Phylogenetic relationships of the Australasian open-holed trapdoor spiders (Araneae: Mygalomorphae: Nemesiidae: Anaminae): multi-locus molecular analyses resolve the generic classification of a highly diverse fauna. Zool J Linn Soc. 2018;184(2):407–52. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlx111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Huey JA, Hillyer MJ, Harvey MS. Phylogenetic relationships and biogeographic history of the Australian trapdoor spider genus Conothele (Araneae: Mygalomorphae: Halonoproctidae): diversification into arid habitats in an otherwise tropical radiation. Invertebrate Syst. 2019;33(4):628–43. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1071/IS18078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Rix MG, Wilson JD, Huey JA, Hillyer MJ, Gruber K, Harvey MS. Diversification of the mygalomorph spider genus Aname (Araneae: Anamidae) across the Australian arid zone: tracing the evolution and biogeography of a continent-wide radiation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2021;160:107127. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ympev.2021.107127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. McCurry MR, Cantrill DJ, Smith PM, Beattie R, Dettmann M, Baranov V, Magee C, Nguyen JM, Forster MA, Hinde J, Pogson R. A Lagerstätte from Australia provides insight into the nature of Miocene mesic ecosystems. Sci Adv. 2022;8(1):eabm1406. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1126/sciadv.abm140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. McCurry MR, Frese M, Raven R. A large brush-footed trapdoor spider (Mygalomorphae: Barychelidae) from the Miocene of Australia. Zool J Linn Soc. 2023;zlad100. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad100.

  63. Cooper SJ, Harvey MS, Saint KM, Main BY. Deep phylogeographic structuring of populations of the trapdoor spider Moggridgea tingle (Migidae) from southwestern Australia: evidence for long-term refugia within refugia. Mol Ecol. 2011;20(15):3219–36. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05160.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Rix MG, Wilson JD, Harvey MS. First phylogenetic assessment and taxonomic synopsis of the open-holed trapdoor spider genus Namea (Mygalomorphae: Anamidae): a highly diverse mygalomorph lineage from Australia’s tropical eastern rainforests. Invertebrate Syst. 2020;34(7):679–726. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1071/IS20004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Byrne M, Yeates DK, Joseph L, Kearney M, Bowler J, Williams MA, Cooper S, Donnellan SC, Keogh JS, Leys R, Melville J. Birth of a biome: insights into the assembly and maintenance of the Australian arid zone biota. Mol Ecol. 2008;17(20):4398. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03899.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Rix MG, Harvey MS. Phylogeny and historical biogeography of ancient assassin spiders (Araneae: Archaeidae) in the Australian mesic zone: evidence for Miocene speciation within tertiary refugia. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012;62(1):375–96. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.10.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Rix MG, Edwards DL, Byrne M, Harvey MS, Joseph L, Roberts JD. Biogeography and speciation of terrestrial fauna in the south-western Australian biodiversity hotspot. Biol Rev. 2015;90(3):762–93. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/brv.12132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Gunter NL, Monteith GB, Cameron SL, Weir TA. Evidence from Australian mesic zone dung beetles supports their Gondwanan origin and mesozoic diversification of the Scarabaeinae. Insect Syst Evol. 2019;50(2):162–88. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1163/1876312X-00002171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Harms D, Roberts JD, Harvey MS. Climate variability impacts on diversification processes in a biodiversity hotspot: a phylogeography of ancient pseudoscorpions in south-western Australia. Zool J Linn Soc. 2019;186(4):934–49. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Bonnet MS. Toxicology of Atrax robustus, the Sydney funnel-web spider. Br Homeopathic J. 1997;86(04):211–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/S0007-0785(97)80047-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. https://www.iucnredlist.org/. Accessed 21 Feb 2024

  72. Checklist of CITES species. The convention on International trade in endangered species of wild fauna and flora. https://checklist.cites.org/#/en.

  73. Fisher MM, Raftos J, McGuinness RT, Dicks IT, Wong JS, Burgess KR, Sutherland SK. Funnel-web spider (Atrax robustus) antivenom: 2. Early clinical experience. Med J Aust. 1981;2(10):525–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1981.tb112973.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Fletcher JI, Chapman BE, Mackay JP, Howden ME, King GF. The structure of versutoxin (δ-atracotoxin-Hv1) provides insights into the binding of site 3 neurotoxins to the voltage-gated sodium channel. Structure. 1997;5(11):1525–35. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00301-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Jan Beccaloni (Natural History Museum London, U.K.) for the loan of the Atrax robustus holotype; Ricardo Lourenço for field assistance and generating preliminary data for this research; Kane Christensen for donating specimens; Marie Herberstein for hosting lab work in Sydney; Frank Köhler and Graham Milledge for hosting work at the Australian Museum; Matt Shaw (Australian Museum) for kindly facilitating the identification of previously synonymised type specimens; Cynthia Chan, Harry Leung and Ron Lovatt (Australian Museum) for assisting with photography of the type of Atrax montanus.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. DH and BAB are indebted to National Geographic Society who generously provided an Exploration Grant (NGS-62237R-19) that enabled this research. BAB also thanks the Australian Geographic Society for sponsoring some of the field work, and DH the Australian Museum for a Research Institute Visiting Research Fellowship that allowed for collections and field work. SFL was supported by the German Science Foundation (Award# HA 8785/5 and KO 3944/10) to DH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DH and BAB conceived the study and provided funding and resources; DH, BAB, BJ, HMS performed the field work; SCF performed the lab work; SCF and SFL performed the analyses; SFL and ND prepared the figures; ND, HMS and SFL identified specimens, prepared the diagnoses and descriptions and clarified species distributions; DH, ND, SFL, HMS wrote the paper; all authors approved the final version of the ms.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danilo Harms.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All DNA specimens were collected under permit (No. SL102329; Department of Planning, Industry and Environment, New South Wales Government).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loria, S.F., Frank, SC., Dupérré, N. et al. The world’s most venomous spider is a species complex: systematics of the Sydney funnel-web spider (Atracidae: Atrax robustus). BMC Ecol Evo 25, 7 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12862-024-02332-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12862-024-02332-0

Keywords