From: Do morphometric data improve phylogenetic reconstruction? A systematic review and assessment
Average support value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Discrete | Continuous | Combined | ||
Solis-Zurita et al. [46] | n/a | PM/LAUP; L-P | 99 | PM/LAUP; L-P | 49 |
Perrard et al. [45] | 98.2a | n/a | n/a | PM/LAUP | 93.2a |
Cichocka and Bielecki [71] | n/a | GW, L-P L-P | 88 75 | GW, L-P L-P | 92 92.5 |
Hendrixson and Bond [74] | 66.3 | n/a | n/a | 7 OG, discretized, L-P 7 OG, SM GW, L-P 3 sig, SM GW, L-P 3 sig, L-P 5 sig, SM GW, L-P | 67.7 66.7 64.7 68.3 62.7 |
Overall average | 82.3 | 87.3 | 73 |