Fig. 5
From: Do morphometric data improve phylogenetic reconstruction? A systematic review and assessment
a) Average support value for shared clades (i.e., equivalent splits) across alternative morphology-based comparison trees averaged across all studies, n = 4 studies. b) Overall performance of different morphological data types across all studies for each pairwise data comparison where the percentage indicates the number of studies in which a given data type performed better. n indicates the number of studies included for each data type in each pairwise comparison. Note that discrete vs continuous comparisons were not available (hence the n/a values for this pairwise comparison)