Skip to main content

Table 3 Bee functional entities. FEs were determined using three functional traits (ITD (a measure of body size), glossa length, and hairiness index (adapted from [74]) using the package mFD (44). In the landscape column, N indicates a species present in orchards surrounded by natural landscape while D indicates species present in orchards surrounded by disturbed habitat. Relative abundance data are derived from Table 1, with rare taxa representing < 5% of collected specimens, common 5–15%, and abundant > 15%. Trait states are derived from the categories outlined for each trait in Table 2 by converting each trait category into a corresponding integer (i.e., the lowest trait category = 1, the highest = 5).Trait states that are filled in grey indicate unique traits (traits possessed by a single bee FE)

From: Functional trait mismatch between native and introduced bee pollinators servicing a global fruit crop

Functional Entity

# of taxa

Taxon ID

Relative abundance

Landscape

Trait

ITD

Glossa

Hairiness Index

FE 1

4

Homalictus sp. 1

Homalictus sp. 2

Lasioglossum (Parasphecodes) sp. 2

Lasioglossum sp. 16

rare

N, D

N, D

N

N, D

2

2

4

FE 2

4

Lasioglossum (Parasphecodes) sp. 1

Lasioglossum sp. 8

Lipotriches sp. 1

Lipotriches sp. 2

rare

N, D

N, D

N

N

3

3

4

FE 3

3

Exoneura angophorae

Exoneura (Brevineura) sp. 1

Tetragonula carbonaria

abundant

N

N

N

2

2

2

FE 4

1

Apis mellifera

abundant

N, D

4

5

4

FE 5

1

Exoneura robusta

common

N

2

3

2

FE 6

1

Lasioglossum sp. 1

rare

D

2

3

4

FE 7

1

Lasioglossum sp. 14

rare

D

1

1

4

FE 8

1

Lasioglossum sp. 7

common

D

2

3

5

FE 9

1

Xylocopa (Lestis) aerata

rare

N

5

3

5