Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media, as well as to allow video information to be shared for both marketing, analytics and editorial purposes.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
BMC is moving to Springer Nature Link. Visit this journal in its new home.

Table 4 Maximum likelihood parameters for three-population demographic model for Western Speckled Dace inhabiting Coleman Creek, Deep Creek, and Foskett Spring inferred using GADMA under fast and slow mutation rates. Values within brackets represent 95% confidence intervals estimated by bootstrapping observed site frequency spectra 100 times

From: Genetic approaches reveal a healthy population and an unexpectedly recent origin for an isolated desert spring fish

Fast Mutation rate (μ = 6.6 × 10−8 bp−1 gen−1)

Slow Mutation rate (μ = 1.2 × 10−8 bp−1 gen−1)

Log likelihood

− 9,239.14

Log likelihood

− 9,496.83

Population size [95% CI]

Population size [95% CI]

NA0

1,890 [1,789 – 1,923]

NA0

3,806 [3,611 – 4,001]

P110

879 [866–884]

P110 (= P111)

7,272 [7,053 – 7,491]

P111

5,863 [5,813 – 5,901]

  

P120 (= P121)

1,011 [998–1094]

P120 (= P121)

1,291 [1,082 – 1,500]

FS0

114 [105–125]

FS0

198 [167–229]

FS1

1,076 [1,023 – 1,088]

FS1

1,958 [1,637 – 2,279]

CC0 (= CC1)

955 [934–975]

CC0 (= CC1)

1,739 [1,561 – 1,917]

DC0 (= DC1)

1,136 [1,112 – 1,152]

DC0 (= DC1)

2,086 [1,812 – 2,360]

Migration rate per generation [95% CI]

Migration rate per generation [95% CI]

mp11-p12

1.1 × 10−2 [1.0–1.1 × 10−2]

mp11-p12

2.0 × 10−3 [1.8–2.2 × 10−3]

mDC-CC

8.0 × 10−3 [8.0–8.1 × 10−3]

mDC-CC

1.0 × 10−3 [0.9–1.1 × 10−3]

mCC-DC

4.0 × 10−3 [4.0–4.0 × 10−3]

mCC-DC

2.2 × 10−4 [2.1–2.3 × 10−4]

mDC-FS

3.1 × 10−3 [3.0–3.1 × 10−3]

mDC-FS

0

mFS-DC

0

mFS-DC

0

mCC-FS

2.7 × 10−2 [2.6–2.7 × 10−2]

mCC-FS

2.0 × 10−3 [1.9–2.1 × 10−3]

mFS-CC

1.6 × 10−2 [1.6–1.6 × 10−2]

mFS-CC

0

Divergence time in years [95% CI]

Divergence time in years [95% CI]

T1

3,783.8 [3,712.4 – 3,877.9]

T1

10,529 [9,989 – 11,069]

T2

587.5 [572.4–595.1]

T2

896 [812–980]

Population split ratio [95% CI]

Population split ratio [95% CI]

Sp11

46.5% [44.7–48.3%]

Sp11

55.5% [53.7–57.3%]

SpCC

88.7% [85.1–92.3%]

SpCC

84.7% [82.5–86.9%]

  1. NA0: size of ancestral population; P110: size of P11 immediately after divergence from ancestral population; P111: size of P11 immediately before second demographic split; P120: size of P12 immediately after divergence from ancestral population; FS0: size of Foskett Spring population immediately after divergence from P12; FS1: size of Foskett Spring population after exponential expansion; DC0: size of Deep Creek population immediately after bottleneck from P11; CC0: size of Coleman Creek population after divergence from P12; mab: migration rate from population a to b; T1: divergence time between P11 and P12; T2: divergence time between Foskett Spring and Coleman Creek population