Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 2 Receptive fig odour at the different sites for the different species

From: Overlaps in olfactive signalling coupled with geographic variation may result in localised pollinator sharing between closely related Ficus species

Species

Locality

Limonene

Linalool

α-cubebene

cyclosativene

α-copaene

β-cubebene

β-elemene

α-cedrene

cis-Thujopsene

β-caryophyllene

€-β-farnesene

F.hirta

Ning

0.1

0.0

3.1

1.7

23.3

1.5

1.7

0.1

2.9

29.1

1.2

F.hirta

Sha

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.2

1.7

0.0

3.5

0.0

0.8

44.6

0.6

F.hirta

Sui

2.5

0.0

0.8

1.7

5.6

0.4

2.2

0.0

0.0

34.0

1.3

F.hirta

SCBG

0.0

0.0

0.6

1.4

10.4

0.0

4.0

3.3

0.0

56.0

2.2

F.hirta

DHS

0.0

0.0

0.8

0.4

8.9

0.0

2.7

13.3

0.5

46.4

2.7

F.hirta

Nan

1.4

0.1

1.1

2.0

12.0

0.4

2.5

3.0

0.0

57.3

0.2

F.hirta

Ding

0.4

0.0

4.8

0.4

27.5

1.0

2.5

2.1

0.0

29.8

0.4

F.hirta

Wan

9.5

5.2

0.7

1.2

10.6

0.1

1.9

5.2

0.0

40.7

2.7

F.hirta

XTBG

2.4

8.9

0.2

0.8

3.0

0.0

18.3

0.0

0.0

22.9

1.2

F.triloba

shimen

1.3

0.0

0.7

1.3

6.3

0.7

0.5

0.2

21.0

19.7

6.6

F.triloba

DHS

0.3

0.0

0.1

3.2

2.2

0.3

2.2

0.2

0.0

40.3

2.8

F.triloba

XTBG

0.5

0.0

5.4

0.4

54.2

2.6

1.3

0.0

0.0

14.2

1.3

F.hispida

SCBG

0.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

8.4

0.0

0.0

14.8

3.2

F.hispida

Nan

6.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

22.2

0.0

0.0

31.5

2.4

F.hispida

Ding

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3.9

0.0

0.0

31.3

3.8

F.hispida

XTBG

1.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

38.6

0.0

0.0

8.0

15.3

F.hispida

Thailand

0.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4.7

0.0

0.0

4.2

9.8

Species

Locality

humulene

Unknown6

Unknown5

germacrene D

α-muurolene

δ-cadinene

(Z)-3-Hexenyl acetate

β-Myrcene

(E)-β-Ocimene

α-Copaene

Unknown c

F.hirta

Ning

4.9

2.7

3.6

5.9

1.7

2.6

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

F.hirta

Sha

7.2

0.9

9.2

5.8

1.6

1.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

F.hirta

Sui

4.6

1.7

7.2

12.4

2.8

1.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

F.hirta

SCBG

8.9

0.5

0.0

1.0

1.7

1.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

F.hirta

DHS

7.1

1.1

0.1

2.2

2.8

1.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

F.hirta

Nan

6.2

0.9

0.3

3.8

1.6

1.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

F.hirta

Ding

4.8

3.3

0.2

5.0

3.6

4.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

F.hirta

Wan

6.1

1.8

0.3

2.2

1.8

2.6

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

F.hirta

XTBG

0.3

1.2

0.0

9.1

5.5

1.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

F.triloba

shimen

2.4

8.2

0.6

7.0

5.6

4.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

F.triloba

DHS

7.2

2.1

0.2

16.8

3.5

2.7

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

F.triloba

XTBG

1.5

3.0

0.0

5.3

2.0

2.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

F.hispida

SCBG

4.6

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

20.3

4.9

4.1

7.1

4.3

F.hispida

Nan

6.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

7.0

9.6

0.4

F.hispida

Ding

6.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.7

5.7

5.4

14.1

0.1

F.hispida

XTBG

2.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

7.8

2.0

1.6

2.8

5.4

F.hispida

Thailand

1.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

20.5

7.0

31.7

2.2

0.1

  1. The numbers correspond to the mean relative proportion of each Volatile Organic Compounds representing more than 5% of the odours in a least one location in at least one species. Data for Ficus hirta from (16). Values in bold indicate compounds that were not observed in any sample of a species. Note the strong difference between F. triloba-hirta and F. hispida