Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media, as well as to allow video information to be shared for both marketing, analytics and editorial purposes.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
BMC is moving to Springer Nature Link. Visit this journal in its new home.

Table 3 χ2-test of geographical association of clades and inferences of biological causes for association for the different clades for a) 16S rDNA and b) ITS-1. The inferences were obtained following the newest version of the inference key given in Templeton (1998).

From: Evidence for survival of Pleistocene climatic changes in Northern refugia by the land snail Trochoidea geyeri (Soós 1926) (Helicellinae, Stylommatophora)

a)

   

Clade

χ2

p-value  

Inference

Haplotypes nested in 1–8

9.000

0.008

Long distance colonisation of MVR from MVS

Haplotypes nested in 1–10

12.000

0.002

Past fragmentation between PTV and CDE

Clades nested in 2–3

68.000

<0.001

Long distance colonization of STB from Albion area

Clades nested in 2–4

9.000

0.008

Past fragmentation between PTV and STV

Clades nested in 2–7

11.700

0.043

Restricted gene-flow with isolation by distance between populations on the Causse de Larzac

Clades nested in 2–8

15.000

<0.001

Long distance colonisation of MUN from SHZ

Clades nested in 3–2

46.384

<0.001

Continuous range expansion with subsequent fragmentation in the Albion area

Clades nested in 3–3

3.111

0.308

No geographical association of clades

Clades nested in 3–4

20.000

<0.001

Range expansion of southern German populations to ESS, but impossible to discriminate between contiguous range expansion and long distance dispersal

Clades nested in 4–1

42.000

<0.001

Past fragmentation between LUB and all other Provence populations, confirmed by longer than average mutational connection

Clades nested in 4–2

34.000

<0.001

Range expansion, but impossible to discriminate between contiguous range expansion and long distance dispersal from LAR to northern areas

Clades in entire cladogram

77.000

<0.001

Range expansion from Provence to Causse de Larzac

b)

   

Clade

χ2

p-value  

Inference

Haplotypes nested in 1–2

46.000

<0.001

Isolation by distance among Provence populations except LUB

Haplotypes nested in 1–4

20.000

<0.001

Inadequate sampling design to discriminate between fragmentation, range expansion or isolation by distance among German populations

Clades nested in 2–1

52.000

<0.001

Past fragmentation of LUB from the rest of the Provence populations

Clades nested in 2–2

34.000

<0.000

Range expansion from the Causse de Larzac to Germany

Total cladogram

86.000

<0.001

Contiguous range expansion from Provence to the Causse de Larzac